Looking At Wal-Mart

August 16, 2007 by Joe Ponzio

I’ve been asked a number of times to analyze Wal-Mart. My goal here is not to offer stock tips; rather, I want you to be able to do it yourself. Still, I looked at (and bought) Wal-Mart for myself, so here it is:

To preface, investors that comb Morningstar to get owner earnings will have noticed that Wal-Mart’s haven’t grown much. But with rapidly growing companies that are real estate heavy (a la Wal-Mart), you need to separate the growth spending from the business value numbers.

According To Morningstar

Morningstar reports Wal-Mart’s free cash flow as rapidly fluctuating from 1998-2007, ultimately ending up right where it started at $4.5 Billion. At a quick glance, it would appear that there is no consistency in Wal-Mart; but, while we like “easy”, we also like “money” and Wal-Mart deserves a little more investigation.

Capital Expenditures

Wal-Mart’s capital expenditures (CapEx) have grown rapidly over the past ten years. Then again, so has the number of stores-from 3,373 in 1998 to 6,779 at the end of fiscal year 2007. The question is: How much does Wal-Mart have to spend to keeps its doors open vs. how much it is spending on growth? For this, we dig into Wal-Mart’s annual reports.

From 1998-2007, Wal-Mart spent approximately $2 Mil per existing store in CapEx. How did we get that? Simple: Number of stores open divided by CapEx for the year. Then, we take a median value because we can’t focus on a single year’s spending or performance.

Wal-Mart also spends roughly $4 Mil to open a new store. To calculate this, we take the change in the number of stores and divide it by the change in CapEx…then take the median value again.

If we backtest that calculation vs. the number of stores open and opened, we see that Wal-Mart (1999-2007) had $110.5 Bil of CapEx according to our calculation and reported $112.6 Bil. Considering that we are rounding all of our numbers and dealing in millions, I’m happy with just a 2% difference and am confident in these numbers.

Now we know roughly how much Wal-Mart’s stores are costing to remain open. Let’s move on to the cash that they generate:

Cash From Operations

The net cash from operations that Wal-Mart reported from 1998 to 2007 grew steadily-and that is the basis for our owner earnings. In fact, using 5- and 7-year timeframes, Wal-Mart’s cash from operations grew at a median rate of 16.9%.

Considering that Wal-Mart’s CapEx are pretty much fixed based on the number of stores they have, we can say that Wal-Mart’s owner earnings are equal to Cash Flow From Operations minus the cost of keeping existing stores open. Take a look:

in $Mil 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Cash From
Operations
7,123 7,580 8,194 9,604 10,260 12,532 15,996 15,996 17,633 20,164
Capital
Expenditures
6,788 7,029 7,816 8,196 8,641 9,182 9,657 10,428 12,148 13,642
Owner
Earnings
335 551 378 1,408 1,619 3,350 6,339 4,616 5,485 6,522

Wal-Mart’s owner earnings have been growing wildly at more than 47% a year-for ten years! Now, we can’t expect that to go on forever. Let’s get a little more conservative. What if Wal-Mart’s owner earnings grew half as quickly over the next ten years as they did over the last ten years?

Assuming owner earnings grew at 23.9%, and discounting back at 15% (our desired return), Wal-Mart’s present value of cash flow is $176,343 Mil. Add in the $61,573 Mil of Shareholder Equity, and we get an intrinsic value for Wal-Mart of $237,916 Mil, or $57.90 a share. With a 25% discount on this giant industry leader, we get a target purchase price of $43.43.

What If We Use A Lower Discount Rate

Let’s look at Wal-Mart if we were to use a 9% discount rate. The future cash would be worth $314,844 and we would get an intrinsic value of $91.61 per share. With a 50% MOS, Wal-Mart would look attractive at $45.81 per share.

Either Way You Slice It…

Wal-Mart, underpriced to its value and trading right around where Buffett bought it two years ago, looks pretty darn attractive. The bad news we got yesterday? It’s all part of the business cycle. Let the analysts focus on short-term results; we buy businesses for the long-term.

A Note From Joe Ponzio

This section is for comments from F Wall Street visitors. Do not assume that Joe Ponzio agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because it appears or remains on this website.