This post is totally out of sync with my 1950s & 1960s Buffett discourse; however, Night ran into a problem that needs fairly quick solving. His sister gave him a sum of money to begin investing and, after explaining how the markets work, that price follows value, etc., he purchased a stock for her. In just days, she was down 15% (though it rallied again after hours to bring her loss to just 1% or 2%.
How can he convince her to stay the course over the long term? Buy her a Happy Meal!
Without letting her know why you are going, take your sister (or loved one) to a McDonald's — preferably a busy one around lunch time. Buy her lunch and enjoy 30 minutes or so of her company. Then, lay it on her.
Night: Do you know why I brought you here?
Sister: Uh, no.
Night: Do you see everyone in line, waiting to throw money into the register for the chance to eat a sub-par hamburger?
Sister: Yeah. So?
Night: Now, let me ask you a question: If you had the chance to own McDonald's — I'm talking, the entire company here — would you want it? Would you want to be the sole owner of the entire company — and all its $21+ billion in sales?
Sister: Of course!
Night: Well, you can. If you wanted to buy McDonald's — the entire company — you would have to pay some $67 billion today. That's what the stock market is pricing it at.
Sister: I'll keep that in mind if I come across $67 billion.
Night: But wait...over the past year, the stock market has priced McDonald's — the entire company — anywhere between $50 billion and $75 billion. So, another question: Is McDonald's — the entire company — worth $50 billion, $67 billion, $75 billion, or more? Or even less?
Sister: I don't know.
Night: But I do. Right now, McDonald's is worth about $65 billion. (No need to go into the details of the valuation) In essence, at today's price of 57-and-change, McDonald's is a very fairly priced company.
Of course, I don't know if it is worth exactly $65 billion. It might be worth closer to $70 billion; it might be worth closer to $60 billion. Now, here's the funny part. Over the last year, you could have bought McDonald's — a $65 billion company — for $50 billion. Sound like a good deal?
Sister: If I had $50 billion.
Night: And what if I told you that you could have bought the $65 billion business for $75 billion. Still sound smart?
Sister: (Her cocky, "no-duh" expression says it all)
Night: Now you see my point when buying stocks. We can't predict when the markets will price our $65 billion companies at just $50 billion. When they do, we'll jump on them. Will we buy at the absolute bottom? Probably not. Still, if McDonald's — the $65 billion company — is a good buy for $50 billion, wouldn't it be an even better buy at, say, $45 billion?
Sister: Yeah, but that makes sense in theory. But Uncle X lost millions in the stock market when it crashed. I remember — they were saying it was because interest rates went up and we went into a recession. Aren't we headed for that now? Maybe I should wait.
Night: Do you know why Uncle X and crew lost so much money? They were buying $65 billion businesses for $70 billion, $100 billion, even $200 billion plus. They were focused on price and had no idea what the values of the companies were.
Take Microsoft for example. Big, huge company. You can buy it today for $320 billion. But eight years ago, Uncle X — like most others — were willing to pay $500 billion for a company that, at the time, was worth less than half that amount. People were paying $100+ a share for a company that, at the time, was only worth about $30 a share.
I've said it before — and it's not my thing, a lot of rich people say it — price follows value. For Microsoft — just like in so many other companies at the time — the price was well above the true value of the company, and only one of two things could happen: 1) the price would fall to a level closer to the value; or, 2) the value would rise to meet price.
More times than not, result 1 happens and people lose their shirts. Make sense?
Sister: I get it — sort of.
Night: Let's turn back to McDonald's. The stock price is about $57 a share, down some 10% from its high over the last year. You see all those people in line? They're still buying hamburgers even though the stock price is down. Why? Because there is a business that operates completely independent of the stock price.
24 hours a day, McDonald's is selling hamburgers around the world — steadily and consistently. And every day, the stock price jumps around like crazy — usually for no reason. Why was McDonald's selling for $17 billion less over the past year? Because people are nuts. I can tell you that McDonald's — the company — didn't grow 30% (from $50B to $65B) in the past year.
Instead, the markets went crazy — going from optimistic to pessimistic and back as they've done for 100 years and as they will do in the future.
Sister: Yeah, but McDonald's price went up. My stock(s) is/are going down.
Night: Sis, we can't control the markets. Our goal is to buy companies like McDonalds when people are willing to sell it for 20%, 30%, even 50% less than what it is worth. Then, we have to let time do its thing — convert the market's pessimism towards McDonald's into optimism. It won't happen overnight. In fact, it may not happen for a few years. But so long as the company is growing, the price will eventually follow.
So long as people are buying hamburgers — or in your case, shopping at American Eagle Outfitters — your business is sound. I'll (Night) keep an eye on what the business is worth, regardless of the stock price. If the business is starting to suffer or show warning signs, I'll get you out. Until then, let's wait until the markets turn their pessimism in retail into optimism.
Then, Night, let us know what happens. Just don't be discouraged — some people will never get it.
Please wait while your comment is submitted. (It may take a moment.) Comments on F Wall Street are moderated which means that your comment will appear only after it has been reviewed by Joe. Comments are typically reviewed and approved (or denied) quickly, except between 11:30PM and 5:00AM (CST) – Joe has to sleep some time!
Thank you for participating on F Wall Street. Once your comment has been approved, it will appear here. While waiting, check out some other articles on the blog or click here to return to the article.
| Excel 2007 | | | Excel 2003 |
| (ZIP, 168kb) | (ZIP, 138kb) |
Sun @ 11:09AM | View comment
Eric T said,
Instead of inventory turnover, I use the cash conversion cycle, or CCC.It is more accurate for companies that manufacture and...
Understanding the True Profit Margin
Sun @ 5:48AM | View comment
Diversification said,
well it all depends on the correlation between the stocks you have choosen many big mutual funds are having the...
The Dangers Of Overdiversification
Sun @ 4:46AM | View comment
sandesh trivedi said,
Very well explained joe. i believe one must also take into account the nature of the product being manufactured while...
Understanding the True Profit Margin
Sat @ 10:19AM | View comment
Ron said,
Hi Joe,Is there a rule of thumb of percentage of net shares sold by insiders where we should start to...
When To Watch Out For Insider Selling
Sat @ 10:18AM | View comment
jan said,
joe, any thoughts on jackson hewitt? what were the risks that played out in your mind when you decided...
BreitBurn Energy: Playing the Commodities Crash
Fri @ 3:20PM | View comment
Joe Ponzio said,
If you don't have the CRB Commodities Index book and software (issued each year for a few hundred bucks), your...
BreitBurn Energy: Playing the Commodities Crash
kfh227
Jan 9th, 2008
27 comments
If anyone asks me one day why I am fully invested in stocks, I'll point to this thread.
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Allen
Jan 9th, 2008
47 comments
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Joe Ponzio
Jan 10th, 2008
Joe on twitter
Ponzio Capital
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Dan
Jan 10th, 2008
3 comments
I have been toying around with thinking about how stocks work. Yes it is nice to see a stock go up in a short amount of time, get out, find the next one and so on...but it is hard. And I am not too good at that. By the time I realize it, it has made its move.
What I am good at is finding a good business and knowing if it is on sale or not. To reap the rewards of that might take a longer time. But it fits my style.
I went to return some clothes a few days after Christmas this year. I was astounded on the mark downs on clothing..( I have not been shopping in a few years....marriage, children, work..etc..) I saw a nice college named jacket on sale. The original amount was $110....on sale for $44. I said to myself, "That is a nice jacket!! But who in their right mind would pay $110 for it!!! It is worth maybe $60 at best." And there it was on sale, marked down to $44.
I didnt' buy it, not becuase something was wrong with it....I just didn't need jacket.
Would I invest in the company that made the jacket...probably not. But I know good merchandise when it is on sale.
Now if I can just think the same way about stocks!!!
Dan
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Laura
Jan 10th, 2008
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
david
Jan 10th, 2008
I got an MBA in finance from one of the best finance programs in the country.
They don't get it either!
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Night
Jan 10th, 2008
72 comments
Apparently when I was asleep last night when my uncle was over they put in a market sell order for AEO & changed the password on her account. I asked her to give me a week to try and sell AEO at not-rock-bottom prices (below $18 IMO). Oh well. I tried. She lost somewhere between $2,000 & $2,500, now my uncle wants me to be responsible for her losses. Once again, she only freaked out this bad because of my uncle's freaking out--I would of been able to convince her otherwise.
Just a crap situation in general. I recommend to never try and assist family with investment; except as a very detached 3rd party. Anything more? Atleast have it in writing.
Anyway, I too will keep a close eye on the stocks I own! Haha
But sorry for harping on and on everyone & thanks for the support!
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
david
Jan 10th, 2008
I think you could make the case that your uncle should be responsible for her losses. After all, he made her take the loss!
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Bill
Jan 10th, 2008
I sometimes tell family that I could lose just as much money for them and they wouldn't owe me a thing!!!
Bill
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Night
Jan 10th, 2008
72 comments
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
J
Jan 10th, 2008
Just as Buffett did in his early partnership (and still does with BRK?) he releases performance figures only once a year.
Pabrai also only releases performance figures 4 times a year.
Keep your investing a black box to those that dont understand and it will benefit both parties.
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Bill
Jan 10th, 2008
Thank you.
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Dennis
Jan 14th, 2008
1 comment
In the future I will explain in GREATER detail to my friends and family the idea behind buying a wonderful business at a low price and being patient enough to wait for the market to catch on. If they don't seem to understand before I manage their money then I will give them the "You are not ready grasshopper" and politely decline.
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
geno CASH IS KING
Jan 15th, 2008
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Night
Jan 15th, 2008
72 comments
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Joe Ponzio
Jan 16th, 2008
Joe on twitter
Ponzio Capital
I wasn't recommending MCD (as Night said). In fact, if you reread the post, you'll see that I explained how fairly valued McDonald's was - give or take a few billion dollars. Since we are looking to buy when the companies in on sale at 50% or more, MCD is clearly a pass at these prices because we can't be certain about the future and we don't want to gamble that our assumptions are dead-on.
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Larry
Jan 23rd, 2008
1 comment
If you will share it, I'll do my own homework. If you don't want to share, please list the top ten undervalued stocks in your universe.
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Joe Ponzio
Jan 23rd, 2008
Joe on twitter
Ponzio Capital
The valuation process is here, along with a number of examples. Take a look at the Categories on the right side of the page to find links to various analyses and other resources.
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
(MikeR)
Jan 28th, 2008
71 comments
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Your Name
Mar 10th, 2010