Late last week, the FCC approved Tribune Company to own print and broadcast media in the same market. Why was this important? Tribune Company (TRB) is going private and the FCC approval was critical to this transaction. Without FCC approval, the deal might not have gone through. With that hurdle out of the way, what's to stop it now?
And how can we make money from it?
Real estate tycoon Sam Zell is planning a buyout of Tribune Company (TRB) at the end of the year for $34 a share. Let me rephrase that—the company is expected to go private in the next 27 days and plans to buy its stock from shareholders at $34 a share.
If the deal can't be completed by December 31st, the company will continue its quest to privatize and will begin paying shareholders an annualized 8% interest rate on their shares until the company goes private.
The stock is currently trading around $30.50. If the deal goes through by December 31st, yesterday's buyers will earn about 11% in a month—an annualized return of more than 265%.
Very little is stopping this buyout plan now. The FCC hurdle was the major one. Though the company needs to get the deal done by the end of the month to qualify for tax credits, the paperwork seems to be in order to push the deal through no matter what.
Let's put some probabilities on this and try to quantify the risks:
What are the odds that the deal will go through by the end of the month? I've seen bigger deals fall through for no apparent reason other than one company couldn't get its ass in gear. Remember GE's planned 8 billion acquisition of one of Abbott's divisions earlier this year? Best as I can tell, Abbott fumbled and couldn't get the required paperwork done in time and GE pulled out.
Even though Tribune has been planning to do this deal since early this year, let's assume that there is a 50% chance that the company will complete its buyout by December 31.
What if the company can't get it done in the next four weeks? We know the company still wants to privatize and is offering a premium of 8% annualized if it can't get the deal done by the end of 2007. Odds of it getting done in early to mid-2008? I'll say 30%.
Of course, the deal can fall through and not close at all. In that case, today's buyers would simply hold Tribune stock. Let's say there is a nearly 20% chance of that happening.
Finally—the doomsday case. There is a small chance that the deal will fall through and that the company will fall off the face of the earth by the end of 2007. Sure, it's a small chance. Still, we'll ascribe a <1% chance of that happening.
In this merger/buyout arbitrage play, I estimate that there is a 50% chance to make an annualized return of >265% by the end of 2007. If the deal can't close until June of 2008, I believe that there is a 30% chance of earning 30% or greater on an annualized basis once you add in the 8% interest being paid.
I believe that there is a one in five (or 20%) chance that the deal won't go through. In that case, I'll hold Tribune stock, or sell it at a loss. On news of the deal failing, I'll put that loss at 15% if I can sell around $26.
If the company goes defunct in the next 30 days, I'll lose everything.
When the odds are in your favor, bet big. I believe that the Tribune buyout presents an interesting opportunity to make a substantial amount of money in a very short timespan. It's not guaranteed or risk-free; still, I believe that the odds are in favor of today's buyers.
Whether or not you buy Tribune stock today, you should consider the use of arbitrage in your investing. Whether you consider pure buyout arbitrage like we are doing with Tribune, or you are using a form of arbitrage in selling options against your positions, the use of arbitrage might make the difference between a good retirement and a great one.
Please wait while your comment is submitted. (It may take a moment.) Comments on F Wall Street are moderated which means that your comment will appear only after it has been reviewed by Joe. Comments are typically reviewed and approved (or denied) quickly, except between 11:30PM and 5:00AM (CST) – Joe has to sleep some time!
Thank you for participating on F Wall Street. Once your comment has been approved, it will appear here. While waiting, check out some other articles on the blog or click here to return to the article.
| Excel 2007 | | | Excel 2003 |
| (ZIP, 168kb) | (ZIP, 138kb) |
Mon @ 12:45PM | View comment
g said,
good timing!
BreitBurn Energy: Playing the Commodities Crash
Sun @ 1:14AM | View comment
mike said,
ROIC is not based on earnings. it's just EBIT * (1-t) / invested capital. The flaw with ROIC...
What The Heck Is CROIC?
Thu @ 8:00AM | View comment
Cale Smith said,
New Ponzio Capital site looks great, Joe, and good to see you back posting!
BreitBurn Energy: Playing the Commodities Crash
Wed @ 5:50PM | View comment
kalidasa said,
in correction to an earlier post, it is Sham Gad(www.gadcapital.com) or www.shamgad.blogspot.com
Hedge Funds and the Early Buffett Partnership
Tue @ 3:29PM | View comment
Joe Ponzio said,
I think it got overheated. I still feel like it's a good long-term holding (if the buy price is right)....
Is Nutrisystem Healthy?
Tue @ 2:48PM | View comment
Nutrisystem Coupon said,
Dude, what happened to this stock? You would think in January this stock would be jumping through the roof...
Is Nutrisystem Healthy?
MikeR
Dec 4th, 2007
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Night
Dec 4th, 2007
72 comments
Thanks Joe :)
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Joe Ponzio
Dec 4th, 2007
Joe on twitter
Ponzio Capital
The buyout price was publicly announced. You can see the press release here.
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Night
Dec 4th, 2007
72 comments
Thanks again!
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Dave Miller
Dec 4th, 2007
I like your idea about selling the downside puts and collecting $1.20. A trade I like better is doing the Jan '08 30 buy write for $3.00. The reason I like this a bit better is that you get downside protection down to $27.00 (vs your $26.30), but you are able to participate in the upside for $3.00. So for giving up .70 cents of downside protection you receive $3.00 upside profit.
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Steve
Dec 4th, 2007
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Mike Melloch (MikeR)
Dec 4th, 2007
71 comments
Very nice idea with the buy-writes.
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
(MikeR)
Dec 4th, 2007
71 comments
I am selling the Dec. 27.5-strike puts. I sold them for $1.20. They expire December 22. If TRB is above 27.50 on Dec 22 I pocket the $1.20 per share. If TRB is below 27.5 on Dec 22 I am forced to buy TRB at $27.50, no matter what TRB is trading at. So if TRB goes to zero in the next 2.5 weeks I loose ($27.50-$1.20) per share, my maximum risk.
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
mule65
Dec 4th, 2007
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
J
Dec 4th, 2007
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
(MikeR)
Dec 4th, 2007
71 comments
Joe's post was regarding regular trading of this arbitrage situation. I started the option thing.
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
giggsy
Dec 4th, 2007
Great article and timely as well. There is a similar arbitrage situation here in Canada regarding the BCE buy out.
There is an opportunity (not as great as yours) to make 10% in the next 5 months.
giggsy
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Jeff
Dec 5th, 2007
Joe- your thoughts on a possible option play here?
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Steve
Dec 5th, 2007
I feel this could hamper the ability of the buyer of Tribune to offload some of the properties in order to pay their soon-to-be large debt load.
Also would that decision over-rule the special situation given to Tribune?
It seems that the market is reacting negatively to these announcements giving possibly a better implied return should the deal go through.
Regardless of the outcome for this particular position I feel that it is a great example of keeping your eyes open for opportunity.
Steve
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Night
Dec 5th, 2007
72 comments
"The legislation, even if successful, is not expected to affect the proposed $8.2 billion buyout of the Tribune Co., which was approved by the FCC last week. It is unclear whether there would be any potential long-term impact on the company."
- source
Not sure if the 'unclear potential impact' will have an effect on Sam Zell's buying decision or not..
Also, from the press release on Nov. 30th
"The company also asked for an extension of existing waivers of the FCC's cross-ownership rule in New York, Los Angeles, Hartford and South Florida -- markets in which Tribune operates both a newspaper and television station. The waivers granted today are temporary, pending the outcome of the FCC's ongoing review of media ownership rules. In Chicago, the company will be exempt from cross-ownership restrictions through a permanent waiver provision. "
-source
So, I guess they will always have the cross-ownership in Chicago.. but the potential of losing the ones in NY, LA, Hartford, South Florida may deter the deal?
I am completely new to analyzing this sort of deal.. How strong of a negative effect is this?
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Joe Ponzio
Dec 5th, 2007
Joe on twitter
Ponzio Capital
The proposed legislation shouldn't affect the Tribune deal as it will affect future reviews. Tribune's waiver will likely be grandfathered in as it was granted when the legislation was not in place.
I looked at the OTM (out of the money) put and call activity, and it appears to be fairly balanced. I never use investor sentiment or price as a guage because, for the most part, investors and institutions are generally wrong and usually earn returns equal to or less than the markets.
What's the move here? Consider buying Tribune with some protection.
- Throw a sell stop on your position to limit your downside;
- sell calls against your position to lower your effective net basis;
- roll the dice and buy TRB because you think the deal will go through;
- find a new opportunity.
If you have a ton of doubt or are entirely unsure and uncomfortable, move on. I say it a lot, but only because it is the right strategy!Hope that helps!
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
augustabound
Dec 5th, 2007
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Joe Ponzio
Dec 5th, 2007
Joe on twitter
Ponzio Capital
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Night
Dec 5th, 2007
72 comments
How's the book shopping going? I don't think we've gotten an update lately.
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
(MikeR)
Dec 5th, 2007
71 comments
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Night
Dec 6th, 2007
72 comments
Anyone get lucky, or was smart enough, to of bought it yesterday when it was at $28 or so? News today seems to of nearly sealed the deal..
Time for me to hang on til the 1st or for some serious news, in any case.
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
(MikeR)
Dec 6th, 2007
71 comments
I was really close to buying my 27.5 strike puts back yesterday and take my losses when it got close to 28, lol. Luckily I did not!
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Jeff
Dec 6th, 2007
http://www.crossprofit.com/article.asp?id=140
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Joe Ponzio
Dec 10th, 2007
Joe on twitter
Ponzio Capital
MikeR - Close call...how short are your nails after last week? Did you bite them off entirely?
Night - I'll have some news on the book soon.
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
(MikeR)
Dec 10th, 2007
71 comments
Yes, they are entirely gone, lol. I look forward to your thoughts on writing puts.
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
(MikeR)
Dec 19th, 2007
71 comments
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
(MikeR)
Aug 7th, 2008
71 comments
EAS is a diversified utility in the northeast. EAS is trading at $25 with a 52-week low of $22.26.
Iberdrola is trying to acquire EAS for $28.50 cash per share of EAS. There are
concerns that NY regulators will impose unacceptable condition on the deal and it will fall through.
The September $22.50 strike puts are bid at $0.90. The worst case seems the deal
falls through before the puts expire in 44 days and EAS trades down to the
neighborhood of its 52-week low. So you end up with EAS put to you at $22.50, with a dividend yield at that price of 5.5%, plus the $0.90 per share put premium.
I must be missing something for the MMs to be pricing such a premium in those
puts?
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Your Name
Feb 9th, 2010