You are here: Home » the Blog » Workouts, Arbitrage, & Hedges » Don't Go Short On Overpriced Companies!

Don't Go Short On Overpriced Companies!

By Joe Ponzio on November 15, 2007  |  4 comments

When you sell stock short, you are essentially selling the stock today with the hopes of buying it back at a later date — and a lower price. We know that price follows value; still, management can do a lot to mess with the company's stock price and screw up your short position.

On a short position, your potential gains are fixed and your opportunity for loss is variable. Not a good way to make money. Let's look at a play that could go very bad.

Why You Would Short

The number one reason to short a stock is because you believe that it is overpriced and you expect the price to drop in the not-too-distant-future. When considering shorting, you need to keep in mind that:

  1. Buffett has never really incorporated shorting in his investment philosophy (he's done alright, no?);
  2. The majority of people owning the stock want it to go up and are buying on that premise; and,
  3. Management can turn an inflated stock price into cash — effectively closing the gap on the difference between price and value and killing your short in the process.

A Simplified Example

If it isn't simple, it usually ain't worth looking at. So, let's look at a simplified case of where a grossly overpriced stock can quickly become fairly priced — without the stock moving.

The Overpriced Company

Let's assume XYZ Company has $1,000,000 in cash, 100,000 shares outstanding, and, well, nothing else. The company isn't operating and nothing is expected to come in or out. The actual value of this company is $1,000,000 — or $10 a share ($1,000,000/100,000 shares).

The Hype

Rumors come out that the company is going to revolutionize its industry. Wall Street goes nuts and runs the stock price up to $50 a share. The reality is that nothing has happened, no money is coming in or out, and the company is still worth $10 a share. A quick call to the company confirms the fact that nothing is happening.

Now Overpriced

As it stands, a $10 company is now selling for $50. If, as we expect, nothing happens at the company, it is still worth just $10 a share and we could effectively sell the stock short at $50, wait for the price to drop to $10, and then buy it back — netting $40 a share in gains.

Lovely, right?

Wrong. Wrong. WRONG!

You know who else sees that $50 stock price? Management — and their mouths are watering. The fact is that overinflated stock prices are assets to the business and liabilities to the shareholders. Let's expand the set-up:

Your friend owns 1,000 shares of XYZ stock — 1% of the company. She believes the hype and has seen her stock price run up from $10 to $50. In her mind, you are nuts believing that the company is overpriced and even crazier for shorting the stock.

The Offering

Management — seeing a $50 stock price — calls their underwriters and investment bankers (the people who run IPOs and sell stock to the public) and explain that they want to have a "secondary" offering of XYZ stock.

The underwriters help XYZ company sell another 300,000 shares at the new price of $50 a share. They sell it to the public by continuing the hype (and bull) that XYZ is revolutionizing the world. After a hefty 7% commission, XYZ company takes in an additional $13.95 million in cash (300,000 shares x $50 a share — $1.05 million in commissions).

The New Value

XYZ now has 400,000 shares outstanding — the 100,000 original shares and 300,000 shares from the secondary offering. It also has $14.95 million in cash on the books — $1 million from before and $13.95 million from the secondary offering.

The new value of XYZ Company: $37.38 a share ($14.95 million / 400,000 shares). Your $40 per share short? Now worth $12 and change — at best.

Buy Low — Don't Sell (Short) High

Selling stock short can be a lucrative play — if you don't get burned by management and the greed of Wall Street's investment bankers. Why add that variable in to your investing? Stick with buying underpriced companies that even management would have a hard time screwing up. Get too cute with your strategies, and you are likely to get burned.

Written by Joe Ponzio on November 15, 2007

Joe Ponzio is the managing partner of the Ponzio Investors Funds and owner of Ponzio Capital Inc, a registered investment advisory and deep value portfolio management firm. The author of F Wall Street (the book and the website), his articles have appeared in hundreds of financial media, including Financial Planning Magazine, CNBC.com, Yahoo! Finance, and Reuters. He has appeared numerous times nationally on both radio and television, and has presented at universities and seminars across the United States.

Read more articles like this online at www.fwallstreet.com.
To learn more about Joe's portfolio management services, visit www.ponziocapital.com.
The Discussion
Anonymous' gravatar

Anonymous
Nov 15th, 2007

I read somewhere (I forgot the source) that Mr. Buffett mentioned in one of the annual meetings (1998?99?) that very early in his career he shorted a stock and because the price went against him he almost had to declare personal bk. I still couldn't find a meeting note containing the exact statement made by Mr. Buffett. If you have any luck, please let us know. Cheers.
Jay S' gravatar

Jay S
Nov 17th, 2007
5 comments

Excellent example of how a short can burn you.

Another critical reason for not shorting, and sticking to underpriced companies, is that an underpriced stock can only go "up" eventually..sure it can move down (which is great buying opportunity further reducing your cost basis) ..or It can move sideways, but time value works in your favor, as the earnings would keep adding up, until the market eventually notices its value.

But an overpriced short could conceptually move sideways for a long time until its earnings eventually "catch up" with its valuation. So when you short, time value actually plays against you.

We all know that markets can stay irrational longer than we can stay solvent. A short's downside is theoretically unlimited, as the stock could climb and climb and climb. So if you must short a (very) overpriced stock, its probably better to buy a put, where your downside is capped to the option's price.
Jay
Anonymous' gravatar

Anonymous
Nov 18th, 2007

Agree. Buying put is one way.

I think shorting works best when you have a fundamentally unsound company selling at a high valuation. So the Apples and Googles of the world certainly won't fit into this category (at least for the time being).
Amit D.' gravatar

Amit D.
Jul 31st, 2008
10 comments

I've been waiting a while to read all your topics, and I'm about to purchase your e-book as soon as I get a replacement credit card !

This was a faaantastic , and intelligent piece of work! Makes me realise I have to WORK HARDER!!

Thanks alot for sharing this with us Mr. Ponzio!
Join The Discussion

Your Name
Feb 9th, 2010

Remember me on this computer
To help keep the F Wall Street website free from comment spam, we require that you have javascript enabled to post a comment. Please turn on javascript and refresh this page to load the comment form.

Joe Ponzio's F Wall Street

Submitting Your Comment

Please wait while your comment is submitted. (It may take a moment.) Comments on F Wall Street are moderated which means that your comment will appear only after it has been reviewed by Joe. Comments are typically reviewed and approved (or denied) quickly, except between 11:30PM and 5:00AM (CST) – Joe has to sleep some time!

Joe Ponzio's F Wall Street

Thank You For Participating!

Thank you for participating on F Wall Street. Once your comment has been approved, it will appear here. While waiting, check out some other articles on the blog or click here to return to the article.

» Buy F Wall Street at Amazon.com

Excel 2007|Excel 2003
(ZIP, 168kb) (ZIP, 138kb)

Search F Wall Street

Powered by Google

Subscribe to F Wall Street

E-mail or RSS updates. And it's free!

Enter your e-mail address below

Sun @ 1:14AM | View comment
mike said,

ROIC is not based on earnings. it's just EBIT * (1-t) / invested capital. The flaw with ROIC...
What The Heck Is CROIC?

Thu @ 8:00AM | View comment
Cale Smith said,

New Ponzio Capital site looks great, Joe, and good to see you back posting!
BreitBurn Energy: Playing the Commodities Crash

Wed @ 5:50PM | View comment
kalidasa said,

in correction to an earlier post, it is Sham Gad(www.gadcapital.com) or www.shamgad.blogspot.com
Hedge Funds and the Early Buffett Partnership

Tue @ 3:29PM | View comment
Joe Ponzio said,

I think it got overheated. I still feel like it's a good long-term holding (if the buy price is right)....
Is Nutrisystem Healthy?

Tue @ 2:48PM | View comment
Nutrisystem Coupon said,

Dude, what happened to this stock? You would think in January this stock would be jumping through the roof...
Is Nutrisystem Healthy?