When you sell stock short, you are essentially selling the stock today with the hopes of buying it back at a later date — and a lower price. We know that price follows value; still, management can do a lot to mess with the company's stock price and screw up your short position.
On a short position, your potential gains are fixed and your opportunity for loss is variable. Not a good way to make money. Let's look at a play that could go very bad.
The number one reason to short a stock is because you believe that it is overpriced and you expect the price to drop in the not-too-distant-future. When considering shorting, you need to keep in mind that:
If it isn't simple, it usually ain't worth looking at. So, let's look at a simplified case of where a grossly overpriced stock can quickly become fairly priced — without the stock moving.
Let's assume XYZ Company has $1,000,000 in cash, 100,000 shares outstanding, and, well, nothing else. The company isn't operating and nothing is expected to come in or out. The actual value of this company is $1,000,000 — or $10 a share ($1,000,000/100,000 shares).
Rumors come out that the company is going to revolutionize its industry. Wall Street goes nuts and runs the stock price up to $50 a share. The reality is that nothing has happened, no money is coming in or out, and the company is still worth $10 a share. A quick call to the company confirms the fact that nothing is happening.
As it stands, a $10 company is now selling for $50. If, as we expect, nothing happens at the company, it is still worth just $10 a share and we could effectively sell the stock short at $50, wait for the price to drop to $10, and then buy it back — netting $40 a share in gains.
Lovely, right?
You know who else sees that $50 stock price? Management — and their mouths are watering. The fact is that overinflated stock prices are assets to the business and liabilities to the shareholders. Let's expand the set-up:
Your friend owns 1,000 shares of XYZ stock — 1% of the company. She believes the hype and has seen her stock price run up from $10 to $50. In her mind, you are nuts believing that the company is overpriced and even crazier for shorting the stock.
Management — seeing a $50 stock price — calls their underwriters and investment bankers (the people who run IPOs and sell stock to the public) and explain that they want to have a "secondary" offering of XYZ stock.
The underwriters help XYZ company sell another 300,000 shares at the new price of $50 a share. They sell it to the public by continuing the hype (and bull) that XYZ is revolutionizing the world. After a hefty 7% commission, XYZ company takes in an additional $13.95 million in cash (300,000 shares x $50 a share — $1.05 million in commissions).
XYZ now has 400,000 shares outstanding — the 100,000 original shares and 300,000 shares from the secondary offering. It also has $14.95 million in cash on the books — $1 million from before and $13.95 million from the secondary offering.
The new value of XYZ Company: $37.38 a share ($14.95 million / 400,000 shares). Your $40 per share short? Now worth $12 and change — at best.
Selling stock short can be a lucrative play — if you don't get burned by management and the greed of Wall Street's investment bankers. Why add that variable in to your investing? Stick with buying underpriced companies that even management would have a hard time screwing up. Get too cute with your strategies, and you are likely to get burned.
Please wait while your comment is submitted. (It may take a moment.) Comments on F Wall Street are moderated which means that your comment will appear only after it has been reviewed by Joe. Comments are typically reviewed and approved (or denied) quickly, except between 11:30PM and 5:00AM (CST) – Joe has to sleep some time!
Thank you for participating on F Wall Street. Once your comment has been approved, it will appear here. While waiting, check out some other articles on the blog or click here to return to the article.
| Excel 2007 | | | Excel 2003 |
| (ZIP, 168kb) | (ZIP, 138kb) |
Mon @ 12:45PM | View comment
g said,
good timing!
BreitBurn Energy: Playing the Commodities Crash
Sun @ 1:14AM | View comment
mike said,
ROIC is not based on earnings. it's just EBIT * (1-t) / invested capital. The flaw with ROIC...
What The Heck Is CROIC?
Thu @ 8:00AM | View comment
Cale Smith said,
New Ponzio Capital site looks great, Joe, and good to see you back posting!
BreitBurn Energy: Playing the Commodities Crash
Wed @ 5:50PM | View comment
kalidasa said,
in correction to an earlier post, it is Sham Gad(www.gadcapital.com) or www.shamgad.blogspot.com
Hedge Funds and the Early Buffett Partnership
Tue @ 3:29PM | View comment
Joe Ponzio said,
I think it got overheated. I still feel like it's a good long-term holding (if the buy price is right)....
Is Nutrisystem Healthy?
Tue @ 2:48PM | View comment
Nutrisystem Coupon said,
Dude, what happened to this stock? You would think in January this stock would be jumping through the roof...
Is Nutrisystem Healthy?
Anonymous
Nov 15th, 2007
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Jay S
Nov 17th, 2007
5 comments
Another critical reason for not shorting, and sticking to underpriced companies, is that an underpriced stock can only go "up" eventually..sure it can move down (which is great buying opportunity further reducing your cost basis) ..or It can move sideways, but time value works in your favor, as the earnings would keep adding up, until the market eventually notices its value.
But an overpriced short could conceptually move sideways for a long time until its earnings eventually "catch up" with its valuation. So when you short, time value actually plays against you.
We all know that markets can stay irrational longer than we can stay solvent. A short's downside is theoretically unlimited, as the stock could climb and climb and climb. So if you must short a (very) overpriced stock, its probably better to buy a put, where your downside is capped to the option's price.
Jay
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Anonymous
Nov 18th, 2007
I think shorting works best when you have a fundamentally unsound company selling at a high valuation. So the Apples and Googles of the world certainly won't fit into this category (at least for the time being).
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Amit D.
Jul 31st, 2008
10 comments
This was a faaantastic , and intelligent piece of work! Makes me realise I have to WORK HARDER!!
Thanks alot for sharing this with us Mr. Ponzio!
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Your Name
Feb 9th, 2010