We all know that the markets are driven by fear and greed. We know that, on a daily basis, we are bombarded with information and news about stocks and the markets. As investors and casual internet surfers, we are flooded with information and advertisements about "The Ten Best Stocks For 2008," "How To Retire Wealthy," and "Oil Sets New High—Stock Market Outlook Is Gloomy (or Rosy)."
In the end, the news sources, the advertisers, the brokerages, etc. have one goal: They want to sell you something. The company with the scariest or most optimistic news will likely attract our attention, and hopefully our dollars, to buy their "protection" or their "solution".
How do we sift through the garbage to find real gems of information—the edge we need to profit greatly?
First off, you need to look at the ultimate intention of the source of information. There is nothing wrong with a website or company profiting from hosting advertisements. In addition, there is nothing wrong with a company (or website) advertising to attract your attention. For example, F Wall Street has had more than 580,000 visitors since its launch in July of 2007. I've profited handsomely—raking in nearly $42 in about three months. (I've stated before—My goal is not to bog everyone down with ads)
To be able to sift through Wall Street's garbage, you need to know a bit about advertising and marketing. Companies issue press releases all the time. For example, take a look at Microsoft's recent press releases. 72 in October of 2007—and we have a few days to go.
Most company-issued press releases are little more than "branding"—a technique used by companies to keep their name and products in the forefront of your mind. When it comes to analyzing companies, you need to sift through the "branding" noise because, more times than not, it will not immediately affect your company.
In an October 2007 press release, Microsoft "announced a strategic alliance to explore ways to improve digital imaging solutions for professional photographers and enthusiasts." Microsoft enthusiasts might get excited and start dreaming of the potential profits. In fact, they'll often start buzzing that this will bring Microsoft to the forefront of digital imaging—and it will crush Adobe in the process.
But what is really being said in this press release? If you break it down, Microsoft did nothing more than announce that it will explore ways to improve digital imaging. Until those ways turn into dollars, Microsoft will likely lose money exploring—paying people to explore without reaping any rewards during the exploration.
Don't run off and short Microsoft just yet! Morningstar reports that Microsoft has generated $54 billion of revenues in the past twelve months. Assuming they put thirty people on a team to "explore" digital imaging—and further assuming the average salary of those thirty people is $80,000 + $10,000 in software and support—Microsoft would spend roughly $2.7 million on this project. Add in costs for space, taxes, 401k contributions, etc., and let's call it a hefty $3.5 million.
If Microsoft gives this team a one-year deadline to come up with something—anything—Microsoft's expenses will increase roughly 0.0065%. No one—not even Wall Street—would notice a 0.0065% increase in Microsoft's expenses and a commensurate 0.0065% decrease in their Net Income.
We'll spend more time on News Vs. Noise this week; however, today's take-home: Don't panic or get excited until you look beyond the "advertisement" and read between the lines. Branding doesn't affect companies so long as the amount spent branding brings about a commensurate level of sales. In this case, Microsoft likely spent little more than $200 or $300 drafting and issuing this press release. Hardly a cause for concern.
The above press release bears little to no affect on the future of the company because, well, hype is hype, and rumors are rumors. Until that "exploration" noticeably affects—or can affect—owner earnings, it is just noise to us.
Price follows value. In the short-term, Microsoft (or competitors) can force gamblers to do crazy, uncomfortable things to its stock price. Still, reality will catch up eventually. It usually does:
Side Note: I have a lot of e-mails from visitors that I need to respond to. I am far behind; still, I will get back to you. Give me another couple of days—I'm not ignoring you! Thanks.
Please wait while your comment is submitted. (It may take a moment.) Comments on F Wall Street are moderated which means that your comment will appear only after it has been reviewed by Joe. Comments are typically reviewed and approved (or denied) quickly, except between 11:30PM and 5:00AM (CST) – Joe has to sleep some time!
Thank you for participating on F Wall Street. Once your comment has been approved, it will appear here. While waiting, check out some other articles on the blog or click here to return to the article.
| Excel 2007 | | | Excel 2003 |
| (ZIP, 168kb) | (ZIP, 138kb) |
Sun @ 9:46AM | View comment
trading for a living said,
I really like this blog post, it has some great info. Thank you and keep up good work.
A Glance At Sharper Image
Thu @ 3:33PM | View comment
MinorityStakes said,
A couple comments regarding BBEP's latest communication with shareholders:* 2009 production just about equaled 2008 production even though capex was...
BreitBurn Energy: Playing the Commodities Crash
Sun @ 11:09AM | View comment
Eric T said,
Instead of inventory turnover, I use the cash conversion cycle, or CCC.It is more accurate for companies that manufacture and...
Understanding the True Profit Margin
Sun @ 5:48AM | View comment
Diversification said,
well it all depends on the correlation between the stocks you have choosen many big mutual funds are having the...
The Dangers Of Overdiversification
Sun @ 4:46AM | View comment
sandesh trivedi said,
Very well explained joe. i believe one must also take into account the nature of the product being manufactured while...
Understanding the True Profit Margin
Sat @ 10:19AM | View comment
Ron said,
Hi Joe,Is there a rule of thumb of percentage of net shares sold by insiders where we should start to...
When To Watch Out For Insider Selling
Ron
Oct 30th, 2007
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Joe Ponzio
Nov 2nd, 2007
Joe on twitter
Ponzio Capital
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Howard
Nov 19th, 2007
Where is the best web site to look for news on a business? Here's an example: Imperial Sugar (IPSU) is down about 6.5% right now, and I look all over (Google finance, Yahoo finance, my broker, Marketwatch, and Clearstation), and when I get news quotes for IPSU on all of these sites I don't see any news on the stock. With such a big percent move compared to the market, I would think there must be some news making this 6.5% move.
Thanks,
Howard
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Dave Miller
Nov 19th, 2007
IPSU is a favorite of the shorts (people who short sell a stock). Approximately 40% of its float is sold short. The stock only trades about 90K shares a day which makes its price movements more erratic. Add to the mix that last week a director was selling shares and that just adds fuel to the fire. In this case you will not find any meaningful news on the stock. In addition to the news providers that you mentioned I would also check the sec filings.
Dave
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Your Name
Mar 14th, 2010