HOME PAGE
Joe Ponzio's F Wall Street
INTRODUCTION
What is F Wall Street?
THE BLOG
For Intelligent Investors
RESOURCES
Websites, Tools, and More
CONTACT ME
Send Joe an E-mail
Joe Ponzio's F Wall Street
You are here: Home Page ›› F Wall Street Blog ›› Stock Analysis ›› A Glance At Sharper Image

A Glance At Sharper Image

Oct
25

In the earlier years of his investing career, Buffett is said to have had more ideas than cash—a situation that has reversed itself as Berkshire's asset base has swelled. In 1999, Buffett reportedly claimed he could earn 50% a year in the stock market if he had just $1,000,000 to invest.

Where would he look to do that? Pabrai claims that early, or low-asset, Buffett would look to buy $0.50 dollars and sell them when they reached 90% to 100% of their true value. He wouldn't be a buy-and-hold investor; rather, he'd look to buy quick-hit (read: 1-3 year) investments.

And with that, let's take an early Buffett look at Sharper Image (SHRP).

Break-Up Versus Intrinsic Value

Every company has two values—the end-operations-and-break-up value and the ongoing business (intrinsic) value. When you buy at a discount to either of those, you'll likely come out ahead—assuming things don't go wildly wrong at your company.

When Wall Street overreacts to bad news, companies can fall out of favor quickly. Prices can drop below intrinsic value, and continue to plummet below break-up value—and business investors can often profit quickly. Case in point: Sharper Image.

Bad News Turns Into Panic

Sharper Image Logo

On October 11, 2007, news hit the street that Sharper Image's sales declined 39%. That same day, a federal judge rejected a proposed class action settlement against the company. Over the next two days, SHRP dropped 52%—from $3.70 to $1.77 a share.

High uncertainty. Big scare. Big profit potential.

Forget Intrinsic Value: Break Up The Company

Admittedly, I can't figure out the intrinsic value of Sharper Image. I have no idea if they'll pull out of the mess they're in and I don't know if it will ever generate cash again. Fortunately, I don't have to know that. There are a million opportunities out there. Still, on such panic and selling, I had to take a look early last week.

It initially hit my radar on my stock screener as I looked for companies that were trading at 50% or less of book value. The screener is a lovely place to start looking for ideas—and Sharper Image warranted a closer look.

As I read through the recent reports and worked the numbers, I derived a rough, fire-sale break-up value for Sharper Image between $3.50 and $4.50 a share. In this game, you don't have to be precisely right—you just need a great margin of safety to protect you when you are wrong.

The Margin Of Safety

Trading at $1.77 a share, Sharper Image was offering a 50%-75% discount from its break-up value. One could essentially buy the company for $1.77 and quickly double their money just by shutting down the doors. Or, we could buy a piece of the company and quickly double our money when Wall Street realized what a mistake it made.

And that is precisely what happened. (Click the image for a larger chart.)

Chart of SHRP

Price Follows Value: Break-Up or Intrinsic

For the most part, the markets are generally efficient. When a company (e.g., Sharper Image) has such a horrendous outlook that it may not survive, Wall Street will generally price the company around its break-up value. Why? For one, Wall Street doesn't know how else to price it.

But the markets aren't entirely efficient, and people will buy or sell with absolutely zero information and 100% emotion—be it greed or, in the case of Sharper Image, fear.

Modern Pabrai, Early Buffett Play

In the case of Sharper Image, the goal was to buy a grossly underpriced business, and then sell it when it reached 90% or so of its scared-but-no-better-price break-up value. To make the numbers simple—buy between $1.80 and $2.25, and sell at $3.25.

With no easily calculated intrinsic value, and with a break-up value conservatively around $3.75 a share, there is no reason to hold this company for the long-term. Still, a $0.50 dollar is a $0.50 dollar, and those are always good buys.

Do that once or twice a year, and you can earn 50% or more—just like Buffett.

Side Note: Dabbling In $1.00 Stocks

Last week, I mentioned that the break-up might have been $5.60, but further research showed $3.50-$4.50. Following that post, I got an e-mail from someone saying:

You are an aggressive idiot. There is a reason it is a $2 stock—it is a bad buy!

The fact that a company is priced at $2, or $1, or $0.10 has nothing to do with whether or not it is a good or bad buy. In fact, Berkshire Hathaway can be a $1 stock. All Buffett would have to do would be to split the stock 127,000 to 1 and voila!—a $1 stock.

With 15.2 million shares out there and a break-up value of roughly $60 million, Sharper Image is worth roughly $4 a share (break-up might be slightly higher or lower, hence the price range). Don't want it to be a $4 or $2 stock? If Sharper Image did a reverse split—say, giving shareholders one share for every ten they owned, Sharper Image would have about 1.5 million shares outstanding. The break-up value would still be $60 million—now roughly $39 a share ($60 million / 1.5 million shares).

The price of a stock is a function of the number of shares outstanding. Don't sweat stock prices. Instead, find value and buy it when it's on sale.

There are 20 comments. Add yours!
Related "Stock Analysis" Articles
Looking At Wal-Mart
Unraveling the retail giant from a business perspective.
Buffett. Coca-Cola. 1988. Now I Get It.
Buffett's 1988 purchase of Coca-Cola stunned and confused the investing world. And it's no wonder - while the investing world was looking at a stock, Buffett bought a business.
Is there value in Berkshire Hathaway?
At $111,000 a share, is Buffett's company a buy?
Research In Motion Analysis
Research In Motion (RIMM) gained 20% on Friday after gangbuster earnings. Even Jim Cramer loves it. Exciting stock or wonderful business?
Bookmark or Share This!
Bookmark on del.icio.us
Digg this article
Stumble this article
Print this article
Subscribe to F Wall Street
 
Reading F Wall Street in Order?
Let's Look At Apple
News vs. Noise: Sifting Through News Advertisements

The Discussion on A Glance At Sharper Image

Howard Levy said, October 25, 2007 @ 11:03 am
Joe,

Isn't there a chance that the results of the lawsuit could quickly cause the breakup value to be significantly less. Given that possibility isn't buying this business a little more like gambling? Or is the chance of that scenario occurring very small?

Thanks,
Howard
Joe Ponzio said, October 25, 2007 @ 11:10 am
I knew someone was going to ask, and I should have put it into the post. The lawsuit that was just turned down was a $19 million settlement. Right now, the company has a book value of about $5.67 a share. Assuming the lawsuit goes through at, say, $25 million, that would hit the liability side and bring book value down about $1.64 a share ($25 million / 15.2 million shares) - to around $4. The company also has an untapped $10 million line of credit. I assumed they would use some or all of that to cover part of the lawsuit, but sneak a bit out before the company was forced into bankruptcy and break-up. That's how I estimated the break-up as low as $3.50 a share.

I think the odds are good that the lawsuit will go through simply because a $19 million settlement was just turned down - hinting that there is fault and that the number should be higher. That's why I didn't want to stick with the $5.30 number.

Hope the helps.
Peterou said, October 25, 2007 @ 6:46 pm
At 2.87 do you think it is still a buy?!
I wish you posted these comments on Oct 11 !!!
Joe Ponzio said, October 25, 2007 @ 6:49 pm
I know - and I'm sorry. I absolutely meant to, but my wife went into labor and I had to shut down for the week. Don't worry - this is hardly the last boat in the ocean!
Dom said, October 25, 2007 @ 6:52 pm
Sounds like a nifty idea but then I read this.

http://www.fool.com/news/foth/2002/foth020129.htm

To me it seems like it is nearly impossible to gain off of stocks such as these since creditors will be getting their money first.

Thoughts of the article? It says to never consider Book Value at the bottom!

Joe Ponzio said, October 25, 2007 @ 10:19 pm
Dom,

When a company has more debt than assets, there is nothing left for shareholders. Right now, Sharper Image can close down, sell of its assets, pay off its debts, and give shareholders roughly $3.50-$4.50 a share.

Of course, until it does that, it may continue to take on debt and surmount losses until there is absolutely nothing left for shareholders. That is, it can eventually get the point where debt exceeds assets and it would be a horrific buy - at which point most investors should stay away.

The article is right about book value - if a company has goodwill and other intangibles. Sharper Image has none, just physical assets and debts.

Still, you have to analyze each opportunity and weight the potential outcomes. In the K-Mart example, there were a ton of pending lawsuits and nobody knew how severly (if at all) those would affect the company. In the above SHRP example, I valued the lawsuit against SHRP at $25 million. If that proves to be higher, or if the company continues to operate at losses and continues to eat away at its asset base and assume debt, the value will drop well below $3.50 - perhaps to or below zero.

The moral is: Weigh each opportunity each time you look at it. SHRP might be good today, but may be horrible tomorrow as more news surfaces. Separate the news from the noise, and make smart decisions.

Hope that helps!
Joe Ponzio said, October 25, 2007 @ 10:31 pm
Oh, and Peterou: I'll be watching the news on the company before I jump in again (if I can). As it stands, I wouldn't pay more than $2 a share today - and certainly not $2.87.
wes said, October 26, 2007 @ 5:59 pm
Bombay company seems to be a question mark for me. Shares are and have been actively trading since their Chap 11. Latest figures show assets greater than debt. Is that why people are still so interested in the stock? Or could there be someone waiting in the wings for all inventory and management to be gone? Your article on Sharper image prompted my inquiry.
gotta look sharp! said, October 29, 2007 @ 12:40 am
Hi Joe,

I respectfully disagree with your analysis. I'm not sure how you calculated your breakup value, and I'd like to know. Here's how I would look at it. In my experience, in order to create a margin of safety in a break up analysis, the analyst must mark the current assets down significantly. While I usually mark most current assets down 40% or so, let's be more aggressive here and mark them down only 20%. Furthermore, we'll give them credit for everything on their balance sheet other than the deferred tax assets, since those are only worth anything if the company stays in business (it seems like you believe those are saleable assets--they are not). Since the co owns no land, all the PP&E is in the process of depreciating so we'll count it at full face value. Working off the 7/07 balance sheet and marking current assets down to 80%, we get a very generous salable asset value of $107M (generous bc we're not really sure what's in prepaids and what's in other assets but we'll include them just for fun). From this we subtract the total of the liabilities and we come up with a NEGATIVE $60M net worth. But we're not done yet. Every retailer signs long term store leases with either mall operators or other landlords. These leases are non cancellable and are very difficult to transfer should a store shut down. Operating leases are not carried on the balance sheet, but are liabilities as real as bank debt, just not as senior. As of 1/07, Sharper Image was committed to paying off $258M in lease expense over the next several years. Again, let's be generous and assume they can get a sweetheart deal from their landlords and mark this liability down to $100M. Now we're talking about a company that to me looks like it's worth about NEGATIVE $160M, but only on a good day. I say that because the legal liability must also be taken into consideration. What we know right now is that a $20M coupon settlement was thrown out by the judge. So AT THE VERY LEAST, the legal liability is likely to be $20M in cash. Remember that the class in question consists of 3M pissed off customers who each bought $300M pieces of junk, so the doomsday scenario (though almost totally unlikely) is $900M. So again, let's be generous and tack on an extra $20M of negative market value. We're now up to NEGATIVE $180M, or -$12 per share. You actually want to own SHRP's assets, you'll get a much better deal at the bankruptcy auction. Yes, I am short SHRP.
Dave Miller said, October 29, 2007 @ 11:10 am
Mr Sharp,

I have the value of total current assets at 106 million as of 7/2007. How did you arrive at your 107 million, which includes an 20% discount?

Also where in your model do you remove the deffered tax assets?
gotta look sharp said, October 29, 2007 @ 2:13 pm
Sorry, mistake in my math, but it doesn't really change anything. Here it is, and hopefully right this time.

Salable net assets calculation based on 7/07 balance sheet:
Cash at face value: 1M
A/R marked down 20%: 9M
Inventory marked down 20%: 56M
Prepaid & other current marked down 20%: 4M
PP&E at full stated value: 62M
Other assets: 9M
Total salable assets: 141M
Total liabilities: 167M
Total net salable assets: -26M
Leases given very generous haircut: 100M
Legal liability given generous assumption: 20M
Total net worth: at most -$146, or -$9.73/share

Note: The deferred tax assets don't count as salable because they represent future tax breaks to SHRP only if the co stays in business.

Keep in mind every assumption I made here is very generous. Ben Graham marked current assets down to 66% and didn't even count PP&E in his salable assets calculations.

Best of luck,

Mr Sharp
Fred A. said, October 30, 2007 @ 3:28 pm
What a truly wonderful website you have created, Joe. It is refreshing to have sharp, bright minds debate valuation from different valuation approaches and perspectives. We all win from this forum and gain an opportunity to learn. So, Mr. Sharp and Joe....keep it up!
Dave said, October 31, 2007 @ 11:59 am
I would like to see this type of evaluation done for a real estate builder Standard Pacific SFP. Right now the market cap is 360 million and the Share Holder Equity is
1,764,370 (According to yahoo). So here is a stock that fits the classic Graham model, trading at less than 66% of it's value. So, the question is, will it stop losing money and rebound?
I guess that's where Value Investing's rubber hits the road. One has to completely understand a business in order to make the call if this is just a business cycle drop (and that it will come back) or if it is a case where "Turn arounds seldom turn".
Joe Ponzio said, November 2, 2007 @ 9:33 am
Everyone has great points here. Break-ups are hard to value and "arbitrage". You need to be confident in your analysis, and then invest in opportunities with which you are comfortable.

Gotta Look Sharp sees no value in Sharper Image and can quickly move on. Personally, I saw it a bit different and felt good about buying at $1.80 for a quick return.

If you aren't sure, skip it! There's plenty of opportunities out there!
gotta look sharp said, November 6, 2007 @ 3:54 pm
Anyone who owns or who is looking at SHRP may want to check out the 8-K filed today with the SEC. SHRP has drawn down $10M on a credit facility with Wells Fargo. When the loan agreement was initially signed back in May, the total amount of the facility was supposed to be $20M, $10M immediately available and $10M available upon syndication of the loan (syndication means Wells Fargo convinces other banks to make the loan jointly with them). In August, Wells Fargo announced that they had not been able to syndicate the loan and that they were extending the expiration date to get more time to try to syndicate it. That expiration date was yesterday. Today, Wells once again extended the expiration date until Jan 15. So let's put this into perspective: an enormous financial institution is: 1) unwilling to make a tiny $10M loan to SHRP unless they can get other banks to share the risk, and 2) unable to convince other banks to share that risk.

Remember that when push comes to shove, Wells Fargo has the most senior claim on SHRP's assets. They are well ahead of stockholders, as stockholders are always the last in line. If the guy who is first in line is refusing to extend credit because there's a significant risk he won't be paid back, why on earth would you want to be last in line, well behind where the bank is? If anyone on this board owns SHRP, ask yourself that question.
miguel33 said, February 17, 2008 @ 8:56 am
Now is trading @ $1.60, so I thought I'd revive this discussion - how do you value a bussiness's break-up value. This is a timely subject, given there are lots of companies trading 10x lower than they were a few weeks ago...
Joe Ponzio said, February 19, 2008 @ 1:24 pm
Great question Miguel. Every day that SHRP can't make money, its break-up value drops. The best way to calculate break-up is to figure out a conservative "fire-sale" value for the assets and then subtract the liabilities (at 100%).

A great topic for a future post!
BP said, February 21, 2008 @ 7:49 am
Curious to see what your post mortem on this post would be.

Thanks
Joe Ponzio said, February 21, 2008 @ 9:03 am
I'll get a post up on this. When buying businesses below book value that are consistently losing money, you expect them to go bankrupt. That's precisely why this was a get-in-get-out play four months ago and definitely not a buy-and-hold company. In these situations, the goal is to make a quick buck on a mispriced company. The risk is that they go under before you get out.

Except in the most remote cases, buying a SHRP situation is pure speculation. In this case, we expected to have a bit of time until they exhausted the $10 million credit line (untapped 4 months ago). Once it has exhausted every resource, it has no option but to declare bankruptcy. As I told Miguel33:
Great question Miguel. Every day that SHRP can't make money, its break-up value drops.
Four months ago, we had a double-MOS: an untapped $10 million line of credit and a price some 50% below the then break-up value. As time goes on, your companies will change - some for better, some for worse. Like workouts, situations like SHRP need constant attention and you must be ready to react quickly.

Take a look at these comments as well to understand why it was certainly not a buy-and-hold, but an opportunity that offered a great value for a quick instant.
Amit D. said, August 20, 2008 @ 5:51 pm
Hi Joe, I have another question! (as with others, feel free to answer them or not)


This one has alot to do with your assessment that break-up value is basically the equity per share (while the business is losing value).

As a previous poster mentionned, there are obligations that MUST be payed regardless --> Leases! (which are not included in Liabilities)


I was wondering if it was a mistake on your part or if there was some rational behind your approach? I'm assuming it was rational since I can't read your mind.

Best wishes! Hope your enjoying ur summer ;)

Join the Discussion on A Glance At Sharper Image

Comments are moderated which means they will not show up on F Wall Street until they are approved. Please keep all comments on topic and clean.

Your Name:  
Your E-mail:  (optional, will not be displayed)
Your Website:  (optional, be sure to include http:// in your URL)
Your Thoughts: