In the earlier years of his investing career, Buffett is said to have had more ideas than cash—a situation that has reversed itself as Berkshire's asset base has swelled. In 1999, Buffett reportedly claimed he could earn 50% a year in the stock market if he had just $1,000,000 to invest.
Where would he look to do that? Pabrai claims that early, or low-asset, Buffett would look to buy $0.50 dollars and sell them when they reached 90% to 100% of their true value. He wouldn't be a buy-and-hold investor; rather, he'd look to buy quick-hit (read: 1-3 year) investments.
And with that, let's take an early Buffett look at Sharper Image (SHRP).
Every company has two values—the end-operations-and-break-up value and the ongoing business (intrinsic) value. When you buy at a discount to either of those, you'll likely come out ahead—assuming things don't go wildly wrong at your company.
When Wall Street overreacts to bad news, companies can fall out of favor quickly. Prices can drop below intrinsic value, and continue to plummet below break-up value—and business investors can often profit quickly. Case in point: Sharper Image.
On October 11, 2007, news hit the street that Sharper Image's sales declined 39%. That same day, a federal judge rejected a proposed class action settlement against the company. Over the next two days, SHRP dropped 52%—from $3.70 to $1.77 a share.
High uncertainty. Big scare. Big profit potential.
Admittedly, I can't figure out the intrinsic value of Sharper Image. I have no idea if they'll pull out of the mess they're in and I don't know if it will ever generate cash again. Fortunately, I don't have to know that. There are a million opportunities out there. Still, on such panic and selling, I had to take a look early last week.
It initially hit my radar on my stock screener as I looked for companies that were trading at 50% or less of book value. The screener is a lovely place to start looking for ideas—and Sharper Image warranted a closer look.
As I read through the recent reports and worked the numbers, I derived a rough, fire-sale break-up value for Sharper Image between $3.50 and $4.50 a share. In this game, you don't have to be precisely right—you just need a great margin of safety to protect you when you are wrong.
Trading at $1.77 a share, Sharper Image was offering a 50%-75% discount from its break-up value. One could essentially buy the company for $1.77 and quickly double their money just by shutting down the doors. Or, we could buy a piece of the company and quickly double our money when Wall Street realized what a mistake it made.
And that is precisely what happened. (Click the image for a larger chart.)
For the most part, the markets are generally efficient. When a company (e.g., Sharper Image) has such a horrendous outlook that it may not survive, Wall Street will generally price the company around its break-up value. Why? For one, Wall Street doesn't know how else to price it.
But the markets aren't entirely efficient, and people will buy or sell with absolutely zero information and 100% emotion—be it greed or, in the case of Sharper Image, fear.
In the case of Sharper Image, the goal was to buy a grossly underpriced business, and then sell it when it reached 90% or so of its scared-but-no-better-price break-up value. To make the numbers simple—buy between $1.80 and $2.25, and sell at $3.25.
With no easily calculated intrinsic value, and with a break-up value conservatively around $3.75 a share, there is no reason to hold this company for the long-term. Still, a $0.50 dollar is a $0.50 dollar, and those are always good buys.
Do that once or twice a year, and you can earn 50% or more—just like Buffett.
Last week, I mentioned that the break-up might have been $5.60, but further research showed $3.50-$4.50. Following that post, I got an e-mail from someone saying:
You are an aggressive idiot. There is a reason it is a $2 stock—it is a bad buy!
The fact that a company is priced at $2, or $1, or $0.10 has nothing to do with whether or not it is a good or bad buy. In fact, Berkshire Hathaway can be a $1 stock. All Buffett would have to do would be to split the stock 127,000 to 1 and voila!—a $1 stock.
With 15.2 million shares out there and a break-up value of roughly $60 million, Sharper Image is worth roughly $4 a share (break-up might be slightly higher or lower, hence the price range). Don't want it to be a $4 or $2 stock? If Sharper Image did a reverse split—say, giving shareholders one share for every ten they owned, Sharper Image would have about 1.5 million shares outstanding. The break-up value would still be $60 million—now roughly $39 a share ($60 million / 1.5 million shares).
The price of a stock is a function of the number of shares outstanding. Don't sweat stock prices. Instead, find value and buy it when it's on sale.
Please wait while your comment is submitted. (It may take a moment.) Comments on F Wall Street are moderated which means that your comment will appear only after it has been reviewed by Joe. Comments are typically reviewed and approved (or denied) quickly, except between 11:30PM and 5:00AM (CST) – Joe has to sleep some time!
Thank you for participating on F Wall Street. Once your comment has been approved, it will appear here. While waiting, check out some other articles on the blog or click here to return to the article.
| Excel 2007 | | | Excel 2003 |
| (ZIP, 168kb) | (ZIP, 138kb) |
Sun @ 9:46AM | View comment
trading for a living said,
I really like this blog post, it has some great info. Thank you and keep up good work.
A Glance At Sharper Image
Thu @ 3:33PM | View comment
MinorityStakes said,
A couple comments regarding BBEP's latest communication with shareholders:* 2009 production just about equaled 2008 production even though capex was...
BreitBurn Energy: Playing the Commodities Crash
Sun @ 11:09AM | View comment
Eric T said,
Instead of inventory turnover, I use the cash conversion cycle, or CCC.It is more accurate for companies that manufacture and...
Understanding the True Profit Margin
Sun @ 5:48AM | View comment
Diversification said,
well it all depends on the correlation between the stocks you have choosen many big mutual funds are having the...
The Dangers Of Overdiversification
Sun @ 4:46AM | View comment
sandesh trivedi said,
Very well explained joe. i believe one must also take into account the nature of the product being manufactured while...
Understanding the True Profit Margin
Sat @ 10:19AM | View comment
Ron said,
Hi Joe,Is there a rule of thumb of percentage of net shares sold by insiders where we should start to...
When To Watch Out For Insider Selling
Howard Levy
Oct 25th, 2007
18 comments
Isn't there a chance that the results of the lawsuit could quickly cause the breakup value to be significantly less. Given that possibility isn't buying this business a little more like gambling? Or is the chance of that scenario occurring very small?
Thanks,
Howard
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Joe Ponzio
Oct 25th, 2007
Joe on twitter
Ponzio Capital
I think the odds are good that the lawsuit will go through simply because a $19 million settlement was just turned down - hinting that there is fault and that the number should be higher. That's why I didn't want to stick with the $5.30 number.
Hope the helps.
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Peterou
Oct 25th, 2007
I wish you posted these comments on Oct 11 !!!
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Joe Ponzio
Oct 25th, 2007
Joe on twitter
Ponzio Capital
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Dom
Oct 25th, 2007
1 comment
http://www.fool.com/news/foth/2002/foth020129.htm
To me it seems like it is nearly impossible to gain off of stocks such as these since creditors will be getting their money first.
Thoughts of the article? It says to never consider Book Value at the bottom!
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Joe Ponzio
Oct 25th, 2007
Joe on twitter
Ponzio Capital
When a company has more debt than assets, there is nothing left for shareholders. Right now, Sharper Image can close down, sell of its assets, pay off its debts, and give shareholders roughly $3.50-$4.50 a share.
Of course, until it does that, it may continue to take on debt and surmount losses until there is absolutely nothing left for shareholders. That is, it can eventually get the point where debt exceeds assets and it would be a horrific buy - at which point most investors should stay away.
The article is right about book value - if a company has goodwill and other intangibles. Sharper Image has none, just physical assets and debts.
Still, you have to analyze each opportunity and weight the potential outcomes. In the K-Mart example, there were a ton of pending lawsuits and nobody knew how severly (if at all) those would affect the company. In the above SHRP example, I valued the lawsuit against SHRP at $25 million. If that proves to be higher, or if the company continues to operate at losses and continues to eat away at its asset base and assume debt, the value will drop well below $3.50 - perhaps to or below zero.
The moral is: Weigh each opportunity each time you look at it. SHRP might be good today, but may be horrible tomorrow as more news surfaces. Separate the news from the noise, and make smart decisions.
Hope that helps!
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Joe Ponzio
Oct 25th, 2007
Joe on twitter
Ponzio Capital
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
wes
Oct 26th, 2007
1 comment
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
gotta look sharp!
Oct 29th, 2007
2 comments
I respectfully disagree with your analysis. I'm not sure how you calculated your breakup value, and I'd like to know. Here's how I would look at it. In my experience, in order to create a margin of safety in a break up analysis, the analyst must mark the current assets down significantly. While I usually mark most current assets down 40% or so, let's be more aggressive here and mark them down only 20%. Furthermore, we'll give them credit for everything on their balance sheet other than the deferred tax assets, since those are only worth anything if the company stays in business (it seems like you believe those are saleable assets--they are not). Since the co owns no land, all the PP&E is in the process of depreciating so we'll count it at full face value. Working off the 7/07 balance sheet and marking current assets down to 80%, we get a very generous salable asset value of $107M (generous bc we're not really sure what's in prepaids and what's in other assets but we'll include them just for fun). From this we subtract the total of the liabilities and we come up with a NEGATIVE $60M net worth. But we're not done yet. Every retailer signs long term store leases with either mall operators or other landlords. These leases are non cancellable and are very difficult to transfer should a store shut down. Operating leases are not carried on the balance sheet, but are liabilities as real as bank debt, just not as senior. As of 1/07, Sharper Image was committed to paying off $258M in lease expense over the next several years. Again, let's be generous and assume they can get a sweetheart deal from their landlords and mark this liability down to $100M. Now we're talking about a company that to me looks like it's worth about NEGATIVE $160M, but only on a good day. I say that because the legal liability must also be taken into consideration. What we know right now is that a $20M coupon settlement was thrown out by the judge. So AT THE VERY LEAST, the legal liability is likely to be $20M in cash. Remember that the class in question consists of 3M pissed off customers who each bought $300M pieces of junk, so the doomsday scenario (though almost totally unlikely) is $900M. So again, let's be generous and tack on an extra $20M of negative market value. We're now up to NEGATIVE $180M, or -$12 per share. You actually want to own SHRP's assets, you'll get a much better deal at the bankruptcy auction. Yes, I am short SHRP.
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Dave Miller
Oct 29th, 2007
7 comments
I have the value of total current assets at 106 million as of 7/2007. How did you arrive at your 107 million, which includes an 20% discount?
Also where in your model do you remove the deffered tax assets?
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
gotta look sharp
Oct 29th, 2007
Salable net assets calculation based on 7/07 balance sheet:
Cash at face value: 1M
A/R marked down 20%: 9M
Inventory marked down 20%: 56M
Prepaid & other current marked down 20%: 4M
PP&E at full stated value: 62M
Other assets: 9M
Total salable assets: 141M
Total liabilities: 167M
Total net salable assets: -26M
Leases given very generous haircut: 100M
Legal liability given generous assumption: 20M
Total net worth: at most -$146, or -$9.73/share
Note: The deferred tax assets don't count as salable because they represent future tax breaks to SHRP only if the co stays in business.
Keep in mind every assumption I made here is very generous. Ben Graham marked current assets down to 66% and didn't even count PP&E in his salable assets calculations.
Best of luck,
Mr Sharp
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Fred A.
Oct 30th, 2007
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Dave
Oct 31st, 2007
14 comments
1,764,370 (According to yahoo). So here is a stock that fits the classic Graham model, trading at less than 66% of it's value. So, the question is, will it stop losing money and rebound?
I guess that's where Value Investing's rubber hits the road. One has to completely understand a business in order to make the call if this is just a business cycle drop (and that it will come back) or if it is a case where "Turn arounds seldom turn".
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Joe Ponzio
Nov 2nd, 2007
Joe on twitter
Ponzio Capital
Gotta Look Sharp sees no value in Sharper Image and can quickly move on. Personally, I saw it a bit different and felt good about buying at $1.80 for a quick return.
If you aren't sure, skip it! There's plenty of opportunities out there!
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
gotta look sharp
Nov 6th, 2007
2 comments
Remember that when push comes to shove, Wells Fargo has the most senior claim on SHRP's assets. They are well ahead of stockholders, as stockholders are always the last in line. If the guy who is first in line is refusing to extend credit because there's a significant risk he won't be paid back, why on earth would you want to be last in line, well behind where the bank is? If anyone on this board owns SHRP, ask yourself that question.
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
miguel33
Feb 17th, 2008
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Joe Ponzio
Feb 19th, 2008
Joe on twitter
Ponzio Capital
A great topic for a future post!
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
BP
Feb 21st, 2008
5 comments
Thanks
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Joe Ponzio
Feb 21st, 2008
Joe on twitter
Ponzio Capital
Except in the most remote cases, buying a SHRP situation is pure speculation. In this case, we expected to have a bit of time until they exhausted the $10 million credit line (untapped 4 months ago). Once it has exhausted every resource, it has no option but to declare bankruptcy. As I told Miguel33:
Great question Miguel. Every day that SHRP can't make money, its break-up value drops.
Four months ago, we had a double-MOS: an untapped $10 million line of credit and a price some 50% below the then break-up value. As time goes on, your companies will change - some for better, some for worse. Like workouts, situations like SHRP need constant attention and you must be ready to react quickly.Take a look at these comments as well to understand why it was certainly not a buy-and-hold, but an opportunity that offered a great value for a quick instant.
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Amit D.
Aug 20th, 2008
This one has alot to do with your assessment that break-up value is basically the equity per share (while the business is losing value).
As a previous poster mentionned, there are obligations that MUST be payed regardless --> Leases! (which are not included in Liabilities)
I was wondering if it was a mistake on your part or if there was some rational behind your approach? I'm assuming it was rational since I can't read your mind.
Best wishes! Hope your enjoying ur summer ;)
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
trading for a living
Mar 14th, 2010
1 comment
I really like this blog post, it has some great info. Thank you and keep up good work.
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Your Name
Mar 14th, 2010