You are here: Home » the Blog » How to Think About Investing » Lessons From the Banking Meltdown

Lessons From the Banking Meltdown

By Joe Ponzio on September 15, 2008  |  21 comments

So...Merrill sells to Bank of America, most likely to avoid bankruptcy, Lehman files for bankruptcy, Bear Stearns sells to JP Morgan, again most likely to avoid bankruptcy. Major financial institutions — once revered as the "crown jewels" of the financial community — are failing. And all I can think is...Are you kidding me?!?

Aren't these supposed to be the greatest financial minds and businesses in the world?

Investing vs. The Business of Investing

The media seems to be soft-shoeing around one issue: These companies are supposed to be in the business of managing money. They preach diversification, conservative values, and "intelligent" investing, and then...

  • they leverage their firms to buy crap investments and
  • assume tons of risk,
  • with absolute disregard for their bosses — the shareholders
  • who have collectively lost hundreds of billions of dollars
  • while the executives have collectively taken home billions of dollars.

They've done it time and time again (think dot-com). And these are the people overseeing the financial futures of millions of investors around the world.

There is a massive disconnect between investing and the business of investing. The "brilliant" minds of Wall Street have once again proven that they are good at the business of investing...but they don't know jack about investing. And once again, Joe and Jane Investor — good people that want to retire comfortably, but realize that they want to focus on anything but investing — get suckered into trusting their money to firms that sell "investing"...but focus on the business of investing.

What is "The Business of Investing"? Making The Case with Mutual Funds.

Many of these large brokerage houses (even if they call themselves Investment Banks) are not in the business of providing growth- and safety-oriented investment advice and portfolio management. They are in the business of selling investments. Any advice they provide is incidental to that end.

How do they make more money? Sell more investments...to more people. The problem — one we've discussed a million times here — is that, at any given time, there are only a handful of truly wonderful investment opportunities available (if any). If these companies waited to sell just those great investments, they'd go broke.

There's very little money to be made recommending our strategy [buy-and-hold].Your broker would starve to death. Recommending something to be held for 30 years is a level of self-sacrifice you'll rarely see in a monastery, let alone a brokerage house. — Warren Buffett

(And, of course, that's why F Wall Street's headline reads: If Wall Street told you how to invest properly, they'd be out of business.)

How do they sell investments? On the one hand, they are investment banks — raising money for companies through IPOs, secondary offerings, bond issuances, and more. On the other hand, they strong-arm mutual funds to churn garbage in Joe and Jane Investor's portfolios.

The Basics of Mutual Funds

To best understand this, you must first understand the business of mutual funds. A mutual fund is a pool of investor money used to buy, hold, and sell stocks, bonds, or other securities. When you buy shares of a mutual fund, the mutual fund manager gets the cash and invests it according to "the Plan" outlined in the prospectus.

(For readers with a more in-depth understanding of mutual funds, I am talking about open-ended funds — the type that Wall Street will typically sell to Joe and Jane Investor, through their IRAs, 401(k) plans, and other accounts.)

Mutual funds are run by mutual fund companies — businesses that make money based on how much of Joe and Jane's money are in the mutual funds, regardless of how intelligently that money is invested or how it performs. All things being equal, a mutual fund company with $1 billion in assets will make ten times more money than a mutual fund company with $100 million in assets.

Get more assets...make more money.

The Whys and Hows of Mutual Fund Strong-Arming

The major Wall Street firms control the assets. Mutual fund companies (read: the executives) make money based on how much money they manage. What do you think a mutual fund company would do to get in bed with Wall Street? Quarterly kickbacks? Pay some of the Wall Street firm's expenses? Perhaps buy some garbage investments from the Wall Street firms that have to sell mediocre and bad investments to make more money?

Try "all of the above" and then some. (You didn't know you could find this information? Sure! It's comfortably buried on page 212 of the Statement of Information filed with the SEC. They didn't tell you about that? Hmmmm.) It's a match made in heaven — mutual fund companies earn higher fees on more assets under management, Wall Street gets a vehicle that will (i) engage in a high number of transactions that will generate commissions, and (ii) buy shoddy investments and hide them among their hundreds or thousands of other positions.

It's a dirty business, and everybody wins but the mutual fund investor.

Are All Mutual Funds Bad?

No. According to the 2008 Investment Company Fact Book issued by the Investment Company Institute, there were 8,752 mutual funds operating in 2007, some of which don't engage in Wall Street's tomfoolery. Of course, you'll likely never hear of them because they focus on growing and preserving wealth — not on getting their name in the news or climbing into bed with Wall Street.

Today's Credit Crisis

So focused on the business of selling investments, these grand old investment firms forgot some of the most basic rules of investing; so, let's review them here:

  • never invest in something you don't understand. (If you lose everything and go bankrupt — or sell your firm to stave off bankruptcy — you clearly did not understand what you were investing in.)
  • avoid permanent loss. (Recognize that some investments will go bad and manage your portfolio to prevent a total loss of the entire portfolio, even if some investments result in losses.)
  • figure out the strength of the floor before you salivate at the look of the ceiling. (Know what is at risk before you drool over potential profits. The Sistine Chapel is beautiful; but, having to jump over a 40-foot-wide black hole to sneak a peek may not make it worth viewing.)
  • focus on intrinsic value. (The value of every opportunity lies entirely in the future, regardless of the past. Just because big bets on bad debt worked in the past does not mean they will continue to work in the future. You have to figure out the value of those bets — not just the price and profit potential.)
  • the company you run belongs to your shareholders. (Don't focus on how big or "savvy" you are. Focus on what is in the best interests of your shareholders. In case you missed the memo: Putting your business at risk of bankruptcy is not in the best interests of your shareholders.)

The list goes on and on.

Attention Joe and Jane Investor — Here's What To Do.

First off, go ahead and make a run on your banks. If you have money with a brokerage firm or bank that is in trouble, get your money the heck out of there! Over the weekend, I spoke to a number of friends and family with savings and checking accounts at Midwest Bank (MBHI) — a well-known local bank — that appears to have lost roughly 1/3 of its equity after its bets on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac went south.

Should you risk your savings because your banker took too much risk?

In reality, I don't want to cause a run on the banks; but, I won't prevent one by saying that everything is fine and that you should wait until it is too late. My recommendation: Move your important savings and checking accounts to banks that have a higher likelihood of weathering the storm. US Bank gets my vote of confidence for checking and savings accounts.

If you have more than $100,000 at the bank... Open a brokerage account and get unlimited insurance on your account. Companies like TD Ameritrade (AMTD) will take out 3rd-party insurance on your account so that, if they fail, your assets are safe. (Compare that to having $500,000 at a bank that fails, leaving you with just $100,000 of FDIC reimbursement.)

You can easily transfer money back and forth electronically between US Bank and TD Ameritrade; so, you don't have to worry about locking up your funds. (Yes — brokerage accounts can act just like savings accounts, and you can even buy CDs.)

Sell your garbage mutual funds. You are better off in cash than in bad investments. I'd be quite angry at my mutual fund managers if they held Lehman, or had big bets on Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac. Kind of like some of these guys:

Some mutual funds with big exposure to bad financials

$11.5 billion of Joe and Jane Investor's money...now worth just $3.9 billion assuming these giants still held these positions. (Funny how familiar some of the names are, too. I wonder if these guys were in bed with Wall Street? What else might drive them to hold $11.5 billion in these risky bets? 8,752 mutual funds out there, and the same names keep popping up. Hmmm.)

At the very least, this is a start to protecting what you have.

Remember: Cash Is King

If you've learned nothing else from this credit crisis, you should walk away with two lessons:

  1. Most investment firms are in the business of selling investments, not in the business of investing for growth and safety; and,
  2. Each firm is failing because they don't have enough cash to pay the bills and keep the doors open.

When it comes down to it, the value of a business is the value of the cash that the business can generate throughout its remaining life. When a business can't generate enough cash to keep operations going, it must sell to another firm, borrow money, issue shares, or close up shop. (That's why these financial giants keep looking for and raising billions in capital to offset losses.)

Focus first on preserving your savings. Then, take steps to grow it. Don't be a mutual fund pawn in Wall Street's game of ever-increasing sales. Instead, look for individual businesses than can generate excess cash, and have a high probability of doing so in the future.

As we're seeing today, no business can survive forever without the ability to generate excess cash. Then again, no business ever failed because it generated too much cash.

If the 300 point drops in the Dow make you sick to your stomach, perhaps it's time to change your strategy.

You may also want to check out:

Written by Joe Ponzio on September 15, 2008

Joe Ponzio is the managing partner of the Ponzio Investors Funds and owner of Ponzio Capital Inc, a registered investment advisory and deep value portfolio management firm. The author of F Wall Street (the book and the website), his articles have appeared in hundreds of financial media, including Financial Planning Magazine, CNBC.com, Yahoo! Finance, and Reuters. He has appeared numerous times nationally on both radio and television, and has presented at universities and seminars across the United States.

Read more articles like this online at www.fwallstreet.com.
To learn more about Joe's portfolio management services, visit www.ponziocapital.com.
The Discussion
Dan' gravatar

Dan
Sep 15th, 2008
3 comments

Absolutely, 100% right on the mark!!

Excellent!

Dan
Amit.D' gravatar

Amit.D
Sep 15th, 2008

It makes me sick too...I'm always bothered by this "business of selling investments". Thanks for thinking about us and righting an insightful post!

G SAM' gravatar

G SAM
Sep 15th, 2008

Alright then,

Today is in the books though. If i can garner any hope after so much confidence has been lost, it is from the fact that the businesses we invest in are the same companys they were yesterday. While the mutual funds fail and I watch as all the liquid funds they had invested dissapear, I still know my money is invested in companys that have proven themselves through intrinsic value.

Joe, Is this an opportunity to jump on some of the big Lehman holdings? Will GE, Linn Energy LLC, UBS, and Pfizer be attractive offers? Or be avoided like plague?
G SAM,

Great businesses selling at a discount to intrinsic value will always be attractive -- even if it takes a few years for the markets to shake out these fears and begin to recognize the values.
Eliot Murray' gravatar

Eliot Murray
Sep 15th, 2008
11 comments

Joe,

Profound. I've been reading headlines all day and I never made the connection you did about the fact that these are the companies that are supposed to know what the heck to do with money. They are giving us advice on investments, while going bankrupt themselves. Thanks for pointing that out.
Michael' gravatar

Michael
Sep 15th, 2008
2 comments

Excellent post!

Great points about these firms not being able to manage their own money, but they want us to let them manage our money. They leveraged up their balance sheet to 30 plus times equity and then invested in risky investments. This is the fallout for taking on large amount of risk. None of them were asking the Fed to help them spread the profits during the good years, so I don't think they can get mad at the Fed for not bailing them out now.

I'm going to keep looking for companies that are selling below intrinsic values. Keep up the good work Joe.
cory' gravatar

cory
Sep 15th, 2008
1 comment

Joe, you're a fantastic teacher.

Thank you for dropping out of premed to pursue teaching!

By the way, there is an amazing book about a teacher named Marva Collins called Marva Collins' Way. It is one of the most important books I've read. If you send me an address I'd be happy to send you a copy.
Matt' gravatar

Matt
Sep 15th, 2008

What do you guys think about risk-arbitrage on MER and BAC? I feel like this is a deal regulators are going to make sure happens, and there's a pretty wide spread right now.
Rene' gravatar

Rene
Sep 15th, 2008
80 comments

My kids are now in their early and mid twenties. Every once in a while they tease me with the following, "hey Dad, it's been almost a week since you last told us never, ever, ever to invest in the stock market through a mutual fund..." They know to either get competent at picking individual stocks, which so far they are unwilling to do, or to buy un-managed, ultra cheap fee, index funds that track a major index such as the S&P 500 (S&P 498 as of today I guess) in a cost averaging tax exempt account. I also told them to set an email alert for their birthdays in 2029 and 2031 respectively to start the gradual shift to bond funds...
Miguelbarbosa' gravatar

Miguelbarbosa
Sep 15th, 2008
2 comments

Hey Joe.

Good seeing you at the conference. Just got back from Chicago. Quick question, what do you think of Vanguard, are they likely to be in trouble?

Miguel

I'll be posting the pics and notes to the meeting tomorrow. Take care.
Bill' gravatar

Bill
Sep 16th, 2008
4 comments

Joe-
I'm wondering how you would value GE right now? Looks like it's at a 5-year low at this point. I'm assuming that much of the recent damage to its price is due to the financial arm, but GE has been among the most solid companies in the world over the years, and I'm getting an attractive intrinsic value. My confidence is tempered by not having a good grasp on how to adjust that number to account for the financial arm. Or is this one of those situations where it's too hard to separate things, and better to stay away?

As usual, loving the insights and can't wait for the book!

- Bill
Gopinath' gravatar

Gopinath
Sep 16th, 2008

Yep, they(Wall street investment banks) did it again! They will probably do it again!

Joe, you are a very good teacher! I really appreciate your work towards educating fellow investors like me.

Gopi

Mark' gravatar

Mark
Sep 16th, 2008
17 comments

Is LNY still in the f wall street portfolio? Seems like a good opportunity now to buy more. Have you increased the position?
Thanks all for the kind comments!

cory: I'm just happy to have found my calling, whether it was in investing, medicine, teaching... I never ask for gifts; but, some people have insisted and been very generous with books. I'd love to read the book. You can find my office address here. Thanks!

Matt: I haven't looked too closely at the BAC/MER deal yet. Because Merrill is so toxic right now, I don't know if I'll ever jump on that one.

Miguel: It was great finally meeting you. (All: If you are looking for a great blog on investor psychology, coupled with about a billion and a half links to other investing blogs, check out Miguel's Simoleon Sense.)

Bill: I like GE, but I don't feel like it's at a big enough Margin of Safety to offer the kinds of returns I want.

Mark: I mentioned in this comment that I have increased the F Wall Street position back up to 20%. I had also said (in that comment):

The price action means nothing without a SEC filing or news release. We went through this with RTSX -- and will see it a ton on these small deals. In RTSX, the price dropped from $30 to $25, or nearly 17%, in the weeks leading up to the shareholder meeting.

Unless and until I get real news that is or has to be filed with the SEC, I don't see any change in the deal outside of the widening of the premium.
(MikeR)' gravatar

(MikeR)
Sep 20th, 2008
71 comments

LNY CEO has been taking advantage of the pull back to acquire stock.

http://tinyurl.com/3hj69r...
Very interesting. Why would he add so much to his position if he didn't see value at those low prices?

Some workouts go bad, but I'm not moving out of LNY until it goes bad...regardless of the price action right now.
Miguel: I forgot to answer your Vanguard question. No -- I don't think they're in trouble. The real peril lies in holding index funds when companies like GM are in the index!
Pete Koch' gravatar

Pete Koch
Sep 25th, 2008
2 comments

The best book I have ever read on the subject of the games Wall Street plays is 'Unconventional Success' by David Swensen, who runs money for the Yale University endowment.

In his book, Swensen lays out numerous techniques Da Boyz use to separate an investor from his money.

My favorite was a Morgan Stanley Index Fund, set up to track the S&P 500. Once established, no active management is required in the portfolio unless S&P adds/removes stocks which make up the index, right? Yet Morgan charged investors a 5.25% load in addition to 12-b and other fees. Compare this to Vanguard's S&P500 tracker, which charges a paltry 0.09% in fees. Somehow, Morgan managed to sell this fund to the fish/sheep. Lots more amazing examples.

After reading Swensen, a sane person would either manage his own portfolio, invest in an Index Fund or three, or hide his money under the mattress. Swensen tells what to look for in an investment manager, but only mentions one name (Southeastern/Longleaf), although I can think of others (like Pabrai) who would qualify.
I think the biggest problem with highly sophisticated investors -- when recommending funds to the public -- is that they dumb people down too much. Many gurus (Buffett included) say that people should dollar cost average (DCA) into index funds if they don't intelligently invest in stocks.

The Case For Index Funds
For a lot of people that really have no understanding of mutual funds, managers, fees, etc., DCA into an index fund is better than nothing and most certainly better than taking a bath from the goofs on Wall Street. If you are totally clueless and you can't find a good money manager -- either a good fund, if doing it on your own, or a good advisor, if you are hiring one -- you should consider splitting your money between index funds and CDs.

The Case Against Index Funds
In 2007, there were 8,752 mutual funds registered in the United States. Most can not beat the markets for whatever reason. But just because most can't beat the markets does not mean that we should draw the conclusion that all can't beat the markets. Many advisors don't understand this because their world of mutual funds is limited to what their firms allow them to sell.

Joe and Jane American that aren't going to buy pieces of individual businesses on their own can still do very well in mutual funds -- just not in most mutual funds. To find great funds, though, requires about as much research as finding great companies. If you have the time and desire to do that kind of research, you should at least consider managing your own portfolio of equities.
BPal' gravatar

BPal
Sep 30th, 2008

Joe - does your brokerage account charge for unlimited insurance on your cash holdings? I'm not too familiar with that option, but another option is to deposit your cash in excess of $100,000 in a bank that participates in CDARS - a network of banks that spread your money into CDs less than $100,000 across each bank, to ensure that the entire amount is insured by the FDIC. You get one statement and negotiate one rate of return.
Tim2' gravatar

Tim2
Oct 3rd, 2008

Here is a tongue in cheek 4 step guide to the banking meltdown. It's funny in a disturbing truthful way...

http://www.stuff.co.nz/47...
Join The Discussion

Your Name
Feb 9th, 2010

Remember me on this computer
To help keep the F Wall Street website free from comment spam, we require that you have javascript enabled to post a comment. Please turn on javascript and refresh this page to load the comment form.

Joe Ponzio's F Wall Street

Submitting Your Comment

Please wait while your comment is submitted. (It may take a moment.) Comments on F Wall Street are moderated which means that your comment will appear only after it has been reviewed by Joe. Comments are typically reviewed and approved (or denied) quickly, except between 11:30PM and 5:00AM (CST) – Joe has to sleep some time!

Joe Ponzio's F Wall Street

Thank You For Participating!

Thank you for participating on F Wall Street. Once your comment has been approved, it will appear here. While waiting, check out some other articles on the blog or click here to return to the article.

» Buy F Wall Street at Amazon.com

Excel 2007|Excel 2003
(ZIP, 168kb) (ZIP, 138kb)

Search F Wall Street

Powered by Google

Subscribe to F Wall Street

E-mail or RSS updates. And it's free!

Enter your e-mail address below

Sun @ 1:14AM | View comment
mike said,

ROIC is not based on earnings. it's just EBIT * (1-t) / invested capital. The flaw with ROIC...
What The Heck Is CROIC?

Thu @ 8:00AM | View comment
Cale Smith said,

New Ponzio Capital site looks great, Joe, and good to see you back posting!
BreitBurn Energy: Playing the Commodities Crash

Wed @ 5:50PM | View comment
kalidasa said,

in correction to an earlier post, it is Sham Gad(www.gadcapital.com) or www.shamgad.blogspot.com
Hedge Funds and the Early Buffett Partnership

Tue @ 3:29PM | View comment
Joe Ponzio said,

I think it got overheated. I still feel like it's a good long-term holding (if the buy price is right)....
Is Nutrisystem Healthy?

Tue @ 2:48PM | View comment
Nutrisystem Coupon said,

Dude, what happened to this stock? You would think in January this stock would be jumping through the roof...
Is Nutrisystem Healthy?