Tim wanted a little clarification on how I came up with a value for JNJ's future cash of $201.7 billion using Excel® (See the full valuation here). The following is a semi-intermediate discussion for Excel® users.
All numbers in $ Millions unless otherwise specified
Enter the Free Cash Flow (FCF) for JNJ from 1997 through 2006 into Excel®. Then, have Excel® calculate the growth rate for various timeframes (I use 5- and 7-year periods to get medium and longer-term performance):
1997-2004
1998-2005
1999-2006
1997-2002
1998-2003
1999-2004
2000-2005
2001-2006
Doing that, you'll be able to see how JNJ performed in various economic conditions and situations for an entire decade. Then, you simply get the median (=MEDIAN(values)) of those values—the median will give you the typical growth rate taking into account any overly high or low values.
In JNJ's case, the median growth rate is 16.1%—and that is the basis for the next step.
Based on the past ten years of steady, consistent growth, we can reasonably expect JNJ to grow FCF at 16.1% for the next ten. After that, to be conservative, we project that JNJ will grow FCF at 5% from years 11-20.
Tell Excel® to grow the FCF at 16.1%, using $11,582 in 2006 as your starting value. 2007 FCF would be $13,444; 2008 would be $15,605—and so on through 2016 (ten years). Then, tell Excel® to grow it at 5% from 2017-2026. You should now have a list of the projected FCF for the next twenty years.
(Once you set up your spreadsheet, this will all happen automatically.)
You can't just buy that future cash at face value—you'd end up with a 0% return. You have to buy that cash at a discount. For example: we estimate that JNJ's FCF in 2015 will be $44,304; so, we have to figure out what price to pay today to earn 15% a year on our money and end up with $44,304 in 2015. In Excel®, there are two ways to do this:
1) Use the Present Value formula for each year: =PV (15%, 2015-2006, 0, -$44,304). Then, add up all twenty years of data;
2) Use the Net Present Value formula for the entire series of cash flow data—from 2007-2026—and let Excel® do all of the leg work: =NPV (15%, [FCF from 2007-2026]).
However you choose to do it, you end up with $201,680—the price you could pay today to get 15% on your money assuming the future cash is as we project it. Of course, you aren't just buying future cash—the company has a net worth of $39,318 in 2006 and you are buying your share of that as well. $201,680 + $39,318 = $240,998. That figure is in millions—translate it to billions and you end up with $241 billion.
What if the 2007 free cash flow isn't exactly $13,444? No problem—we have to look at businesses over various timeframes and not sweat over the actual year-to-year performance. Think about it: Does it make sense to analyze ten years' worth of data in 5- and 7-year blocks, project twenty years into the future, and then worry about the daily stock price or one-year performance?
Relax. You're not gambling in stocks anymore—you are buying businesses. It is a whole different world.
Please wait while your comment is submitted. (It may take a moment.) Comments on F Wall Street are moderated which means that your comment will appear only after it has been reviewed by Joe. Comments are typically reviewed and approved (or denied) quickly, except between 11:30PM and 5:00AM (CST) – Joe has to sleep some time!
Thank you for participating on F Wall Street. Once your comment has been approved, it will appear here. While waiting, check out some other articles on the blog or click here to return to the article.
| Excel 2007 | | | Excel 2003 |
| (ZIP, 168kb) | (ZIP, 138kb) |
Sun @ 9:46AM | View comment
trading for a living said,
I really like this blog post, it has some great info. Thank you and keep up good work.
A Glance At Sharper Image
Thu @ 3:33PM | View comment
MinorityStakes said,
A couple comments regarding BBEP's latest communication with shareholders:* 2009 production just about equaled 2008 production even though capex was...
BreitBurn Energy: Playing the Commodities Crash
Sun @ 11:09AM | View comment
Eric T said,
Instead of inventory turnover, I use the cash conversion cycle, or CCC.It is more accurate for companies that manufacture and...
Understanding the True Profit Margin
Sun @ 5:48AM | View comment
Diversification said,
well it all depends on the correlation between the stocks you have choosen many big mutual funds are having the...
The Dangers Of Overdiversification
Sun @ 4:46AM | View comment
sandesh trivedi said,
Very well explained joe. i believe one must also take into account the nature of the product being manufactured while...
Understanding the True Profit Margin
Sat @ 10:19AM | View comment
Ron said,
Hi Joe,Is there a rule of thumb of percentage of net shares sold by insiders where we should start to...
When To Watch Out For Insider Selling
Jordi
Jul 5th, 2007
2 comments
This is a great idea.
I'm going to work through your valuation and get back to you.
Cheers
J
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Tim
Jul 5th, 2007
2 comments
Thank you for clarifying. I am sure this tool will be beneficial for individual investors that don't want to reply on analysis done by others.
Thanks again
Tim.
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Dave
Jul 9th, 2007
14 comments
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Joe Ponzio
Jul 9th, 2007
Joe on twitter
Ponzio Capital
If you assume that Berkshire can keep growing its Free Cash Flow above 20%, then yes, Berkshire is trading at a discount to its intrinsic value.
Here, you run into a question of management. So long as you have the world's greatest investor at the helm, the future looks bright. Once management changes hands, growth may dry up.
This is definitely worth a post in and of itself. I'll put it together this week and email you when it is online.
Joe Ponzio
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Andrew
Aug 21st, 2007
Just found this site and it's great but I'm still a little confused as to your answer to the original question.
Can you explain what is going on behind the NPV calculation in excel as if you were to calculate it without excel?
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Joe Ponzio
Aug 23rd, 2007
Joe on twitter
Ponzio Capital
Think of it this way: If I offered you $100 next year if you gave me a sum of money today, how much would you be willing to pay for that $100? If you wanted a 10% return on your investment, you could not give me more than $90.91. Growing $90.91 to $100 in one year gives you a 10% return.
You can see the actual formula here on Wikipedia. Look at the first example to see how to discount each year (or term) back to today's value.
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Sanjay Shetty
Sep 10th, 2007
24 comments
What's with the 5% and how do you arrive/choose a random number like 5%, or am I missing something?
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Joe Ponzio
Sep 11th, 2007
Joe on twitter
Ponzio Capital
If I use, say, 10% for years 11-20, I'll end up with an extremely high value for my business. It is impractical to think that a business can sustain high rates of growth for very long. If I buy on the assumption that it'll grow at 5%, and then it grows at 7%, I make more money.
That leads into the second part: 5% is a conservative growth rate for large companies. By increasing prices with (or slightly ahead of) inflation, cutting expenses, and through other "sustaining" tactics, a business should be able to grow its cash at 5% over the long term. It won't be rapid growth; still, it is fairly easy to obtain.
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
SP
Sep 11th, 2007
I'm pretty new at all this and find your ideas clearly expressed, logical, and more or less in line with my perspective on things. Thanks for taking the time to write and respond to us.
Concerning DCF and margin of safety in valuation: if I think the company is going to grow at 10% for 10 yrs and 5% for 10 yrs after that, would I be adding in my margin of safety by using a discount of say 8% for 10, then 3% for 10? Or, what if I use 10% for 5, 5% for 5, and 0 thereafter? I guess what I'm trying to figure out is this: what are the dangers and problems of being overly conservative (especially after yr 10, since that is pure speculation) with your discount numbers?
Appreciate you insight. Thanks.
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
DRP
Sep 12th, 2007
1 comment
First of all, thank you for posting such rational and informative thoughts and information on your blog. It's in the top 3% of finance blogs I've read so far. I understand your valuation approach and have started using it myself.
I'm confused on two points in the calculation of the future value of cash flows.
1. You start the 20 year cash flow projections from the last year's cash flow. For example, in 2006, JNJ had $11,582 (mil) of FCF. Thus, that's the starting point for years 2007 and beyond. That's fine if the FCF in the last fiscal year was representative of a company smoothly growing FCF over time (like JNJ) -- it's predictable. What about for companies that have more irregular or cyclical cash flow? Do you use an average of the last X years (3, 5, 7, or whatever seems representative) as a starting point?
2. I also see you use the median, multiyear FCF growth (16.1 for JNJ) in projecting future FCF for the near future (3-10 years or so). I'm wondering if you ever knock a few points off that number for some extra margin of safety? For example, you might look at JNJ and say, yes, they're growing FCF at a median of 16.1% over multiple rolling periods, but what if they can't do that for 10 more years. Maybe it will be a tougher business climate or their drug pipeline will stagnate for a while? Do you ever do this? I'm doing this b/c I feel it gives me some more safety in the fact that I don't know all the details of any given business since I a) am not an insider, and b) don't have a crystal ball.
Thanks for any help. Please keep up the informative blogging!
DRP
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Joe Ponzio
Sep 12th, 2007
Joe on twitter
Ponzio Capital
1) The idea behind valuing a business is comfort. Consistent businesses lend themselves to that. Cyclical or inconsistent ones do not. Still, it is okay to value and buy those businesses if you are confident in your reasoning and data. I stay away from cyclical businesses because I never know how wide or devastating the next cycle will be.
As far as other companies - companies that have been inconsistent but may become consistent - it comes down to educated guessing (as does everything else). If you think that the multi-year average can give you a basis for future value, then go ahead with it.
Remember: There are enough consistent, simple businesses out there that you don't have to take big chances or risk. Take a look at this post - Does Discounted Cash Flow Always Work? - to see how big gains can be made in simple, slow growing companies.
2) I am not fixated on the past. A perfect example: the American Eagle Outfitters analysis. AEO's growth was through the roof for the past 10 years, but I chose to use half of it's historical 35.4% growth rate to predict the future. Why? I wasn't comfortable saying AEO would continue to double in size every three years for ten more years. There is little or no moat in AEO and a ton of competition.
To use the past rate, you should have an extremely durable, wide, deep moat and a business that will be needed in ten or twenty years. People will need Johnson & Johnson's products and services; a VHS-only movie store, no matter how great, won't be around in ten years (if any still exist).
Hope that helps!
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
kl
Jan 15th, 2008
1 comment
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Joe Ponzio
Jan 16th, 2008
Joe on twitter
Ponzio Capital
The detailed explanation is quite long. E-mail me and I will send you a full explanation with examples.
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
edward
Jan 17th, 2008
9 comments
Thanks,
Edward
p.s. great blog
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Nick
Feb 13th, 2008
7 comments
your blog is a great source of value-investing information, I love it!
I do have one question about the Margin of Safety. In your JNJ excel sheet you use a 15% discount rate and then you want a 25% discount to the calculated value before you buy in. That 25% is your Margin of Safety.
You calculate the 25% Margin of Safety with the formula:
(1 - 0,25) x per share value
In my opinion that's way more than a 25% discount. I measure the discount this way:
(intrinsic value - the value the company is trading for today) / the value the company is trading for today
So let's say our estimated intrinsic company value is 100 million, it is currently trading for 75 million. Now if we use your 25% discount calculation:
(1 - 0,25) x 100 million = 75 million
We see that the company is trading at exactly 25% discount.
But if we use my calculation we get:
(100 - 75) / 75 = 33% discount.
Ofcourse the value of the company stays exactly the same and the discount calculation doesn't matters that much. Still I think my calculation is more fair, because if the company would rise from it's current value (75 million) to it's intrinsic value (100 million) we would have a 33% gain, not a 25% gain.
( sorry for the long post, it got a bit out of hand :P )
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Night
Feb 13th, 2008
72 comments
Really, we're getting a margin of safety/room for error for our calculations.. not for our potential gains.
I don't see the point in overcomplicating it and lowering your room for error.
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Nick
Feb 13th, 2008
7 comments
I don't see why you say I'm overcomplicating things and am lowering my room for error. The room for error stays exactly the same and the calculation of the discount uses the same primary school math as Joe's method, so no overcomplicating whatsoever!
And I'm not lowering the amount of leeway at all, because I know that 25% discount in Joe's way is more than 25% in my calculation!
The only point I was trying to make was that with the method I use, you get a more 'true' insight on how much your stock is underpriced. At one glance you can see the potential return the % the stock is underpriced.
My long post may have made it look more complicated than it was meant to be.
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Night
Feb 13th, 2008
72 comments
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Nick
Feb 13th, 2008
Never thought of calculating it that way. I'll keep that in mind. Thanks for sharing.
Also, I've been commenting here for awhile now, and was hoping you wouldn't mind using your last initial so we don't get confused. Thanks.
Nick (1)
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Joe Ponzio
Feb 13th, 2008
Joe on twitter
Ponzio Capital
It's six of one, half a dozen of the other.
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Nick K.
Feb 14th, 2008
7 comments
No problem!
@ Joe:
True ofcourse; it won't make a lot of difference, it's just a different way to get a somewhat the same result :)
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
jazzy
Sep 5th, 2008
1 comment
1. Does FCF= Cash Flow From OP minus cash flow used in investing activity
2. the spread sheet formulas are too difficult (eg.npv(15%,B23:K23,B25:K25) K9
to understand as in if you could use simple terms such as , - , / , * it would be simpler for me to calculate
If you could atleast explain the Total value(B28) formula in easy terms ( ,-,/,*) it would be of great help as the other formulas i have somehow figured out
thanks in advance
Jazzy
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Amit
Nov 7th, 2008
In essence, if your owner earnings projections were on spot, you would enjoy a 33% bonus in your overall return on investment over the 20 year projection period.
Theoretically, if you sold in 20 years at Fair Value, your return should be 16.7% annually.
Correct me if I'm wrong
Amit
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Your Name
Mar 14th, 2010