HOME PAGE
Joe Ponzio's F Wall Street
INTRODUCTION
What is F Wall Street?
THE BLOG
For Intelligent Investors
RESOURCES
Websites, Tools, and More
CONTACT ME
Send Joe an E-mail
Joe Ponzio's F Wall Street
You are here: Home Page ›› F Wall Street Blog ›› Investing Basics ›› What is a No-Brainer investment?

What is a No-Brainer investment?

Feb
29

A few weeks back, I sent an e-mail to our advisers talking about the "no-brainer" type investments we are looking for. I wrote a nice, long e-mail (in true Joe fashion) about discounted cash flow and valuing businesses, about speculation versus investing - it was practically a novel in and of itself. Then, I deleted the whole thing, and started from scratch.

The way I figured it, you shouldn't have to be a rocket scientist to understand "no-brainer" investing. Here's a recap of what I wrote:

What is an investment? As I've told you in the past, I'm a big fan of putting money in when an opportunity jumps out at me. Let's look at (and use) the definition Ben Graham laid out in 1934:

An investment operation is one which, upon thorough analysis, promises safety of principal and a satisfactory return. Operations not meeting these requirements are speculative.

I have a $100 bill for sale, but it comes with a catch: You have to pay me today and I'll deliver the bill in five years. Right now, thousands of people are bidding on this bill. I've got offers as high as $86 and as low as $50. What's it worth to you? To truly understand the opportunity being offered, we apply Graham's 3-point definition - the foundation of all investing.

Safety of Principal

For this example, we'll simply assume that you will know where to find me in five years, and that I'll have at least $100 to my name. Safety of principal is a non-issue here.

Thorough Analysis

When analyzing companies, you must thoroughly analyze the prospects of the company, the management, the financials, and the future outlook - not just for tomorrow, but for five and ten years from now. In workouts, you must thoroughly analyze the terms of the deal, the price offered, the timeline, and the risks involved.

Thorough Analysis means an in-depth analysis of the opportunity, not just the price. (That's why some horrible companies can present attractive investment opportunities from time to time.)

For my $100 bill offer, you must thoroughly analyze the opportunity - what will this $100 bill be worth in five years? (We assume you know what a $100 bill is and that the US Government is guaranteeing that it will remain as legal tender.) Right now, inflation is running about 3% a year. (I can't remember the last time I saw just a 3% increase in anything. A discussion for another time.) Five years from now, my $100 bill will be worth $85.87 in today's dollars. If inflation is higher - say, 6% - the bill will be worth just $73.39 in today's dollars. Your thorough analysis leads you to believe that inflation will be about 5% over the next five years, and that this $100 bill will be worth $77.38 in today's dollars.

We now know (a) your principal is safe because I'm personally guaranteeing the $100 bill and that guarantee is good, and (b) after careful consideration and analysis of the US economy and inflation, I'm offering you $77.38 in today's value.

Satisfactory Return

Now, a little math. I'm going to present the actual math so that you can see the numbers; then, I'm going to show you the "no-brainer" way to buy $100 bills. Not a math person? Don't be scared, just follow along for the explanation.

You want to earn at least 10% on your money each year, net of inflation. You have an opportunity to buy $77.38 of value, net of inflation. If you offer me $77.38, you can expect to break dead-even. Offer me more, and you will lose money to inflation, even if you make $20 or so in real dollars.

So, what's the price you can pay?

Excel tells me that the present value of this $100 bill is $48.05, assuming 5% inflation and a 10% after-inflation return. Said another way, you can offer me $48.05 today and expect to earn 15% a year for five years (10% a year after 5% annual inflation) and to end up with $77.38 in today's dollars.

Returning to Safety of Principal

We now turn back to Safety of Principal We initially assumed that (a) you knew where to find me, (b) I'd have $100 to my name, and (c) the United States would still be honoring today's $100 bills as legal tender. In reality, you don't know exactly where I'll be and you can't follow me around all day. (Just like in stocks. We have officers and directors to "follow the company around all day" because we can't. And that's a risk.)

Enter the Margin of Safety. At $48.05, everything would have to play out as planned for you to earn 10%, net of inflation. If I'm not around, you lose money. To protect yourself from this risk, you decide to split your money up. Rather than buying one $100 bill from me for $48.05, you choose to buy two $100 bills - one from me, one from another guy in another town also offering $100 bills. With $48.05 to spend, you offer each of us $24.02, and refuse to pay any more than that. You demand a 50% Margin of Safety.

Doing so, you have cut your risk in half. If both of us are around in five years, you'll earn much more than 10% because you'll have bought $77.38 of value for just $24.02 - and did it twice - for an average annual return of 26%. If one of us can't cough up the $100, you'll still be paid on the other. You'll lose 100% on one investment, but earn 26% on the other, netting you 10% after inflation. You would have still invested a total of $48.05 and ended up with one $100 bill.

(Diversify? You can't put all your eggs in one basket, nor should you put each egg in a separate basket.)

The Full Package

To truly understand this opportunity, you must have an understanding of inflation, the direction of the economy over the next five years, discounted cash flow, and more. To identify a "no-brainer" investment, you must be able to fully understand the offer.

In common stocks, you must understand the business and its future; in workouts, you must know the terms and the risks. "No-brainers" only appear easy if you have put some thought into the opportunity.

So, how will I know when I see a no-brainer?

If I offered you the above $100 bill deal, you know exactly what price to pay because we just went through all the math, we analyzed the risks, and we attacked the problem from all sides. And now that you have a somewhat intimate knowledge of how to buy $100 bills, use it to find opportunities.

For sale: $50 bills, payable in five years. $6.74, or best offer.

Want one?

There are 18 comments. Add yours!
Related "Investing Basics" Articles
When Should I Sell My Stock?
At what point to you take the money and run? There is only one reason to ever sell your stock.
How To Recover Losses
How long do you wait for your company to bounce back - to turn around?
The Graham And Dodd Method
A look at the Graham & Dodd Method of stock valuations. KISS.
News vs. Noise: Sifting Through News Advertisements
How do you know what is noise and what may have a meaningful impact on your company?
Bookmark or Share This!
Bookmark on del.icio.us
Digg this article
Stumble this article
Print this article
Subscribe to F Wall Street
 
Reading F Wall Street in Order?
Pre-Regulatory Workouts
Amylin III - Seven months (and much heartbreak) later

The Discussion on What is a No-Brainer investment?

david said, February 29, 2008 @ 11:33 am
I love it!

Buffett compared identifying undervalued stocks to identifying a fat person: you might not know if they are 130 or 150 pounds overweight, but you can tell that they are quite fat.
edward said, February 29, 2008 @ 1:24 pm
David, I believe Buffett was referring to intrinsic value and how it is not an exact science.
Night said, February 29, 2008 @ 2:17 pm
Nice, really effective example. No-brainers can take a bit of brains to figure out.. Then the investment itself becomes a no brainer :)
Wayne said, February 29, 2008 @ 2:23 pm
Joe,

Yes, I'll pay $6.74. I'll even pay more for large amounts. How many can I buy?

Ed said, February 29, 2008 @ 2:40 pm
Best blog I have read in a while.

I am new to financial math, so could you please explain how "Excel tells me that the present value of this $100 bill is $48.05". I now how to use excel, but I can't figure out how you got the $48.05.
david said, February 29, 2008 @ 3:46 pm
Ed --

I'm not sure I get your point.

Buffet's quote was something like:

"You don't need to know a person's exact weight to tell if she was fat.."

So...

You don't need to know a stocks exact intrinsic value to know if it is _______.

Josh said, February 29, 2008 @ 10:15 pm
Ed,

I had the same question.

Joe,

When I plug, =NPV(5%,0,0,0,0,100) I end up with $78.35, not $77.38. Further, if I evaluate the net present value of the same amount ($100) at 15% adjusting for my acceptable return an inflation I get $49.72.

What am I missing?

Regardless of mathematical nuance, thanks for the post and the site in general. I read posts as they're made and appreciate your willingness to share.

Best,


Josh
BlahBlah said, February 29, 2008 @ 10:42 pm
Short but fabulous stuff

Which brings me to a question. You stated a well known truth that I've always had a problem with(I just like good management, a high ROE and a wide moat)

"That's why some horrible companies can present attractive investment opportunities from time to time"

I know you shun the black boxes called banks, but how would C fair under that quote? Like a moth to a flame, I am draw to fear and love to take advantage of it. I simply can not bring myself to buying garbage even at deep discounts.
mark said, March 1, 2008 @ 12:21 am
Great blog as usual. I know that the $100 example is completly hypothetical but is inflation and a prediction on the future of the economy really a incorporated into buffetesque valuation?
Everything I have studied on value investing and the buffet world claims it is not important what the economy is doing if you are buying a wonderful business at a discounted price.
Is the concern for inflation more important when deciding on bond investments since the return is predetermined rather then stock investments? Should we be incorporating inflation into our margin of safety in our valuations for stock investiments?

Mark
Art said, March 1, 2008 @ 8:32 am
Joe,

I don't do this full-time and lean on excel to help crunch financials efficiently. I'd like to be sure I'm doing this the right way and would appreciate an example. Do you have an excel template for your stock analysis method? I've created one following "The New Buffetology" book and workbook, but the books don't have exact formulas for each of the 12 financial calculations. I suspect that's because the writer recommends a less mechanical analysis method, but time is an issue for me. If I have to use a mechanical method I'd at least like to be using the correct formulas.
EMueller said, March 1, 2008 @ 10:08 am
Ed,
I come up with the same numbers as Josh for the NPV calculations.

What do you think are the odds of me finding you in 5 years? :)



EAM
Joe Ponzio said, March 1, 2008 @ 10:26 am
Wayne: I'm fresh out of $50s. Sorry.

Ed & David: Two sides, same coin (in my opinion).
  1. He wears size 60 jeans. No need to know his exact weight, or
  2. He's 450 pounds. No need to see him to know these size 32 jeans won't fit.
Josh & Ed: The formula I used was the FV (future value) formula in Excel:
=FV(-5%,5,0,-100)
Your formula calculates: How much do I need to invest today at 5% growth to end up with a final amount of $100. We need to know: How much will $100 be worth if it falls at 5%. These are two different questions.

Think of it in terms of gaining vs. losing 5% a year on an investment. After 5 years, $1000 would grow to $1,276 - a gain of $276 - or fall to $774 - a loss of $226. Both changed 5% a year, but the dollar amounts were different.

Try this: =NPV(-5%,0,0,0,0,77.38). You'll end up with $100 - the present value of $77.38 five years from now, assuming a 5% drop each year.

(Ed, five years from now, I hope to be right here. ☺)

BlahBlah: I don't shun banks, I'm just not willing to put money in at seemingly "attractive" levels because I don't have confidence in my assessment of "attractive". That said, if I were to see something silly going on, I'd consider an investment.

The sub-prime mess is real, and I can't judge how deeply it will affect the banks so I don't feel good right now. Back in the 1960s when American Express got crushed for losing money on salad oil/sea water, I would have considered buying because it wasn't a fundamental business problem.

Are Citi's problems fundamental to their business as a bank and to what extent? I don't know exactly, so I can't feel good. But, if the stock was getting kicked in the teeth because they misplaced $4 billion of sea water, I'd be all over it.

Mark: When buying businesses, you need to factor in inflation to the extent that the following can be answered: Can this business raise prices to match or beat inflation? Inflation is not a concern to Coca-Cola because it can do just that. It is, however, a concern to Fortress Investments (FIG) - a company that relies on (a) aggregating new assets and (b) growing existing assets, because revenues are/seem to be directly tied to the performance and breadth of the assets managed. FIG's industry hovers around charging 1% or so of assets managed and, no matter how bad inflation gets, that fee can't really go much above, say, 2% or investors will leave for "cheaper" funds.

In the asset management business, it is all about performance and fees. Investors are rarely loyal (in mutual funds), competition is fierce, and pricing is generally fixed. As such, inflation can be a concern.

That's why I like to just stay away from such difficult problems.

Art: There are some Excel spreadsheets floating around the net and on some of the posts on this site, but they should only be used as preliminary screeners. Each company requires a thorough analysis, one that can not be performed by Excel. Check out some of the past posts (I know there's one for the Johnson & Johnson post).
StayRational said, March 1, 2008 @ 4:39 pm
Great Post. Very simple and speaks to the essence of what its all about.

The intricacies, however, makes the game all the more interesting....good investing everyone.
BlahBlah said, March 1, 2008 @ 11:34 pm
Fair enough Joe

Buffett has owned WFC for a long time and also owns BAC
I also hold both(my only US banks but not because of Buffett but my own research)

Any insight in to why Buffett holds them? Belief in management and/or brand? Both are vulnerable to the mortgage mess.

My reasoning has been that banks are cash machines, even poor ones can make money(Buffett's quote about even an idiot can run them). Subprime will end someday and the cash machine will start paying off again.
kfh227 said, March 4, 2008 @ 1:46 pm
Was BAC bought by Geico's Olza M. Nicely? It is my understanding that WEB allows Olza to buy/sell stock under Geico. But this is then reported as a Berkshire Investment (in all those wonderful forms at Edgar online) and people assume it was a decision made by WEB.

Thoughts anyone?
silversurfer said, June 17, 2008 @ 2:27 am
Joe,

First, congrats to your site, I discovered it yesterday and already love it.

Regarding your $100 example above:

I can follow the 5% annual inflation example where $100 in 5 years are worth $77.38 today.

However for the 15% annual inflation (or 5% inflation, 10% return) example I get a different result from Excel. I got $44.37 instead 48.05.
Not sure whether I'm missing something.

Cheers,
SS
Joe Ponzio said, June 19, 2008 @ 10:18 pm
BlahBlah: Years ago, Buffett made a comment about banks. Basically, he was amazed that there was no real moat. A small, successful bank can make money hand over fist, just like a large one (but on a smaller scale obviously). If well managed, banks can generate tons of excess cash without assuming much risk. I suspect that's why Buffett has always liked them.

kfh: Not sure about BAC and Buffett specifically for the reason you mentioned — it's hard to tell what Buffett bought and what was purchased by managers in his subsidiary companies. Personally, I think this $4 billion CFC acquisition is downright stupid so I wouldn't go near BAC for at least a while longer.

SS: Check out the questions Josh and Ed had, and my response to them. If that doesn't answer it, send me an email.
rona said, July 9, 2008 @ 6:17 pm
My calculation is the following: $48.05 =$77.38/(1.1^5), this is the amount of money you need in year 1 to generate $77.38(the true value of the $100 bill at the end of the year 5) assuming 10% return per year. Thanks for the interesting example!

Join the Discussion on What is a No-Brainer investment?

Comments are moderated which means they will not show up on F Wall Street until they are approved. Please keep all comments on topic and clean.

Your Name:  
Your E-mail:  (optional, will not be displayed)
Your Website:  (optional, be sure to include http:// in your URL)
Your Thoughts: