In Workouts Work Out In Down Markets — Part 3, I discussed another workout opportunity in the acquisition of Radiation Therapy Services (RTSX) by Vestar Capital Partners in a going-private transaction. The deal was pending shareholder approval and customary closing conditions. Since that post on January 21, 2008, the price fluctuated quite considerably and shook the nerves of a lot of holders.
This is a prime example of why you should use price as a tool, not a guide.
In the eleven trading days since I wrote that story, the price of RTSX has fluctuated wildly — from as high as $30.02 on the 22nd to as low as $26.58 a week later. This 11% drop shook holders and many people began second-guessing their positions. To truly understand this psychology, one need not look much further than the Yahoo! Finance message boards for RTSX. Some visitors were steadfast; some were terrified because the price was moving for no "apparent" reason.
In reading the merger agreements and SEC filings, we found that management controlled more than 40% of the outstanding shares (and had committed to voting in favor of the transaction), that financing was all but guaranteed, and that little stood in the way of this transaction, save the customary class action lawsuits and final shareholder approval.
At today's special meeting to approve or dismiss the transaction, 99.7% of the outstanding shares voted in favor of the merger, and it is now expected to close on February 21, 2008. Of course, that sort of super-majority wasn't required; we needed just 10% of the outstanding votes to agree with management's 40+% affirmative vote.
The above announcement was made at 5:55pm EST, nearly two hours after RTSX closed today around $28. It will likely open and trade close to $32.50 until the close on the 21st, and the premium will probably remain gone throughout (though I'll be watching it to double-dip).
What happened when the price kept dropping? I bought more, even buying some shares on margin. Why? Simple — I used price as a tool to profit, not as a guide to influence my decisions. Regardless of whether RTSX was trading at $30 or $25 this morning, the terms of the deal were the same, and were contingent on a small number of shareholders voting for the transaction.
What happened to the price of RTSX over the past two weeks as this shareholder meeting approached? A slew of people (and likely a number of hedge funds) used price as a guide and began panicking when the price dropped. The more RTSX fell, the more they panicked. It happens all the time.
You must use price as a tool, not a guide, in your investment decisions. In this case, there was no insider selling, no hints of a failing deal, and no news or reason to believe that anything was wrong with the transaction. Instead, sellers lost money and/or opportunity because other investors were panicking. They traded on noise and emotion, not news.
On a short-term basis, emotion and noise drive the markets. On a long-term basis, enterprising, non-conventionalist investors stand to profit greatly from this inefficiency.
Efficient Market people: If all information is immediately priced into every security, how do you explain when no information and 100% emotion is priced into a security like RTSX?
Why do we engage in workouts? Because it beats the pants off of leaving idle cash in a money market and it helps smooth out down markets. Lest you think every old workout deal is money in the bank, let me assure you that they are not always so — and they require some in-depth research and monitoring (though not necessarily a ton; if it doesn't jump out at you, pass).
Once you've analyzed the deal, considered the possible risks, and determined the attractiveness and relative safety of a particular workout, you need to check in on it every day until the deal is done. I'm not talking about sweating over the price; you need to stay on top of the SEC filings to see if anyone close to the deal is selling (or buying). You have to be prepared to react, and even take the occasional (perhaps substantial) loss, if the deal is falling apart; you must be able to hold strong when there is nothing but price movement. Finally, you must remember that thousands of investors full of emotion — both fear and greed — are trying to make more and lose less than you and that you can not let these speculators influence your decisions.
In the end, I spent about an hour or so ripping apart the RTSX deal. (Of course, I've analyzed thousands of these deals so I knew what to look for and what to avoid.) Once I invested, I'd be shocked if I spent more than 2 minutes a day looking at the EDGAR filings, press releases (or lack thereof), and price. In total, less than an hour and a half were spent on finding, understanding, and staying on top of this workout. The net result should be about a 24% gain in four weeks, keeping in mind a few things:
Buffett has been known for saying he just needs one or two great ideas a year. You are no different (except that smaller investors can find many more; Buffett couldn't put any real money to work in RTSX). If you could find one practically-cash-in-the-bank workout every two or three months, and earn just 10% on each (assuming you don't use margin), you are looking at a 32% annual return after paying 30% in taxes (46% if done in a tax-free account).
Don't salivate just yet; you will get caught with your hand in the cookie jar from time to time! Still, your results can be quite satisfactory.
And the question naturally follows, "How much of my portfolio should I allocate to workouts?" On Friday, we'll take a look at asset allocation for conservative, non-conventionalist investors.
Please wait while your comment is submitted. (It may take a moment.) Comments on F Wall Street are moderated which means that your comment will appear only after it has been reviewed by Joe. Comments are typically reviewed and approved (or denied) quickly, except between 11:30PM and 5:00AM (CST) – Joe has to sleep some time!
Thank you for participating on F Wall Street. Once your comment has been approved, it will appear here. While waiting, check out some other articles on the blog or click here to return to the article.
| Excel 2007 | | | Excel 2003 |
| (ZIP, 168kb) | (ZIP, 138kb) |
Sun @ 9:46AM | View comment
trading for a living said,
I really like this blog post, it has some great info. Thank you and keep up good work.
A Glance At Sharper Image
Thu @ 3:33PM | View comment
MinorityStakes said,
A couple comments regarding BBEP's latest communication with shareholders:* 2009 production just about equaled 2008 production even though capex was...
BreitBurn Energy: Playing the Commodities Crash
Sun @ 11:09AM | View comment
Eric T said,
Instead of inventory turnover, I use the cash conversion cycle, or CCC.It is more accurate for companies that manufacture and...
Understanding the True Profit Margin
Sun @ 5:48AM | View comment
Diversification said,
well it all depends on the correlation between the stocks you have choosen many big mutual funds are having the...
The Dangers Of Overdiversification
Sun @ 4:46AM | View comment
sandesh trivedi said,
Very well explained joe. i believe one must also take into account the nature of the product being manufactured while...
Understanding the True Profit Margin
Sat @ 10:19AM | View comment
Ron said,
Hi Joe,Is there a rule of thumb of percentage of net shares sold by insiders where we should start to...
When To Watch Out For Insider Selling
George
Feb 6th, 2008
7 comments
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Art
Feb 7th, 2008
4 comments
Thanks for your feedback about pre-merger news and share price manipulation. You were certainly right about DISK, as the merger was cancelled on Tuesday. Of course it tanked on Wednesday. I looked for other examples (ads, frz, phh) and noticed the same post-breakup plunge. Aside from FRZ, I also noticed some significant bounce-back 1-3 weeks after the breakup plunge. Is there legitimate opportunity to make money on failed mergers?
Chart
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
david
Feb 7th, 2008
I think inexperienced people ("I") have trouble with workouts because we are trying to "prove the null hypothesis": I can't find any negative information, but how I can be sure that no negative information exists?
In the case of RTSX, it is clearly worth $32.50 to Vestar, and the deal looks very likely. When the stock is at $27.00 and keeps sinking, it is pretty logical to think that the market is reacting to some negative information that you have missed, isn't it?
I guess I simply need to watch some workouts closely, and get a good feel for how irrationally the market can behave during workouts absent any information!
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
AlexG
Feb 7th, 2008
5 comments
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Caleb
Feb 8th, 2008
1 comment
"To evaluate arbitrage situations you must answer four
questions: (1) How likely is it that the promised event will
indeed occur? (2) How long will your money be tied up? (3) What
chance is there that something still better will transpire - a
competing takeover bid, for example? and (4) What will happen if
the event does not take place because of anti-trust action,
financing glitches, etc.?"
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Art
Feb 9th, 2008
4 comments
I start here:
http://www.mergerinvesting.com/pendingmergers
And then research filings, news etc... using Yahoo or Morningstar. If better sources are available please share...
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Dan
Feb 9th, 2008
36 comments
Thanks!
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Night
Feb 11th, 2008
72 comments
I'm learning how to look through these types of deals right now. Trying to figure out what sort of lingo means a deal or solid vs what type gives the financing, etc. lots of ways to get out.
Anyway, for this one I am confused where the regulators come in, or if that is past? Can someone point me to the part of whatever filing it is that declares that any regulatory clearance is complete?
Assuming I am overlooking the regulatory approval.. I think that this deal may have such a huge spread because of the distance of the closing date and the financing. How much of a guarantee is a letter of commitment from a bank, where there is no contract or anything happening with the bank until the closing date?
People who know what is going on help me out with breaking this one down a bit please.. I am still really unfamiliar with these types of filings.
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Night
Feb 11th, 2008
72 comments
But I did some learnin'.
From the Definitive Proxy Statement dated Nov. 7, 2007. These regulatory-related things were listed as needing to be completed.
Link
1. the expiration or early termination of any waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, which is referred to as the HSR Act
2. the receipt of all gaming approvals required to be obtained prior to the effective time
3. the absence of any order, injunction or other legal restraint issued by any governmental entity or any law prohibiting, restraining or rendering illegal the consummation of the merger
So, 3 things.
Current Report dated January 16, 2008
Link
1. "in December 2007, the applicable waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act expired without the Sponsors or the Company having received a second request for information."
Regulatory problem 1, cleared!
2. "In November 2007, the Ohio Racing Commission approved the Merger"
Partially cleared.
"In February 2008, the Sponsors are scheduled to appear before the New Jersey Racing Commission"
Not cleared yet.
"The Company has not been notified by any other regulatory body of the date on which it might expect the Merger to be considered"
Not cleared yet.
3. Seems like we are good so far.
It looks like this deal has a larger than usual amount of regulation to go through. It doesn't look to be causing a problem so far, though. I don't have time right now, but they mentioned that they operate in 15 jurisdictions (or something like that). And I saw an article headline that said Minnesota (or somewhere) is voting to strip a number of cities of their right to have casinos. Can someone look into this? Does PENN operate any casinos in such cities? I will break down this part of the deal when I am out of class.. I'm late now!
All input is appreciated. Remember I'm new.. what have I overlooked?
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Dan
Feb 11th, 2008
36 comments
So it appears the primary fears are with both the financing and regulatory approvals. To address the latter, this analyst sees "little risk to Fortress and Centerbridge receiving the necessary licensing approvals."
http://news.moneycentral.msn.com/ticker/article.aspx?Feed=AP&Date=20080116&ID=8048784&Symbol=FIG
Due diligence should be done of course. I, like you, are a newbie, and would love to know where people like that get their information.
Dan
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Dan
Feb 11th, 2008
36 comments
Q: Can you comment on how things are progressing with this transaction?
A: To my knowledge, very well. ... This is a fully financed transaction, like Harrah's. We had locked-in financing from the outset. Financing with virtually no escape from the banks.
Link
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Joe Ponzio
Feb 11th, 2008
Joe on twitter
Ponzio Capital
Before anything does upset the applecart, you should know exactly what you are going to do before you buy in the first place. If you like the company, you may consider timeing your exit. If you are not sure or don't like the company, it may be best to jump ship - even at a (substantial) loss - and move on to the next deal.
All: This is the benefit of having a community of non-conventionalists. Admittedly, I have not gone into PENN in great detail. Give me a few days to rip the deal apart and I will see if I can offer any insight beyond the great comments here.
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Night
Feb 12th, 2008
72 comments
I'm in on this one. I wonder what Joe's opinion will be... get back to us, Joe, especially if you think I've made a mistake haha.
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
David Veprek
Feb 19th, 2008
1 comment
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
vinay vaidya
Apr 10th, 2008
2 comments
i am frm India and in capital markets fr long time but i have taken lot of inspiration frm Warren buffet --- Mohnish --- ur website and the knowledge i got --- has made me understand the investment philosophy that can be used tp generate better returns than bench mark indices -- much more peacefully than an average fund manger spends gut wreching moments of life in watching market gyrate voilently over which one has no control
i believe in following principle
ENJOY THE PROCESS MUCH MORE THAN THE PROCEEDS --- AS PROCEEDS ARE MOMENTARY --- TIME RATIO OF PROCESS TO PROCEED IS SOME THING LIKE THIS INFINITY YO 1 --- we will die once and before that we will leave life say 70/80/90 years ---- so what shd u cherish --- life ( process ) or death ( proceed)
sorry fr this sinister example -- but it is enough to drive home the point i suppose
IF U RESPOND I WILL BE HIGHLY OBLIGED and would communicate wth u
I have started putting Free Cash Flow concept to indian markets and will send u just to give u a feel of where equivalent of Dow stks in India stand on approcah given by u
bye
Vinay Vaidya
india
( REPLY | PERMALINK )
Your Name
Mar 14th, 2010