<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: From A Mile Away: The Business of Alcatel-Lucent</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fwallstreet.com/article/59-from-a-mile-away-the-business-of-alcatel-lucent/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fwallstreet.com/article/59-from-a-mile-away-the-business-of-alcatel-lucent/</link>
	<description>Value Investing Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 10:55:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Ponzio</title>
		<link>http://www.fwallstreet.com/article/59-from-a-mile-away-the-business-of-alcatel-lucent/#comment-276</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Ponzio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 08:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fwallstreet.com/article/59-from-a-mile-away-the-business-of-alcatel-lucent#comment-276</guid>
		<description>I think ALU is poorly run from top to bottom. Still, bad business or bad management? I truly don&#039;t know.

Dan: All the more reason to scream, &quot;F Wall Street!&quot; As much as I like Morningstar&#039;s premium tools, I don&#039;t trust anyone&#039;s research but my own!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think ALU is poorly run from top to bottom. Still, bad business or bad management? I truly don&#8217;t know.</p>
<p>Dan: All the more reason to scream, &#8220;F Wall Street!&#8221; As much as I like Morningstar&#8217;s premium tools, I don&#8217;t trust anyone&#8217;s research but my own!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.fwallstreet.com/article/59-from-a-mile-away-the-business-of-alcatel-lucent/#comment-268</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 13:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fwallstreet.com/article/59-from-a-mile-away-the-business-of-alcatel-lucent#comment-268</guid>
		<description>Interestingly enough, Morningstar gives ALU its top 5 star rating!   They value the company @ $18, mainly based on the cost savings incurred through the merger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interestingly enough, Morningstar gives ALU its top 5 star rating!   They value the company @ $18, mainly based on the cost savings incurred through the merger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slick</title>
		<link>http://www.fwallstreet.com/article/59-from-a-mile-away-the-business-of-alcatel-lucent/#comment-267</link>
		<dc:creator>slick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 07:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fwallstreet.com/article/59-from-a-mile-away-the-business-of-alcatel-lucent#comment-267</guid>
		<description>Wow, another loosing quater by Russo and collegues. They ran lucent into a hole, got themselves sold to the French and now are running that company into the ground. I smell some GE operative here. No surprise when some german company buys the french telcom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, another loosing quater by Russo and collegues. They ran lucent into a hole, got themselves sold to the French and now are running that company into the ground. I smell some GE operative here. No surprise when some german company buys the french telcom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.fwallstreet.com/article/59-from-a-mile-away-the-business-of-alcatel-lucent/#comment-266</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 06:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fwallstreet.com/article/59-from-a-mile-away-the-business-of-alcatel-lucent#comment-266</guid>
		<description>I was just poring over the WSJ this morning, and read that ALU was disappointed with a lack of capital expenditures on behalf of their subsidiaries.  What a great idea!!  Burn through more even more cash.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just poring over the WSJ this morning, and read that ALU was disappointed with a lack of capital expenditures on behalf of their subsidiaries.  What a great idea!!  Burn through more even more cash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

