<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Buffett May Not Have Sold JNJ</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fwallstreet.com/article/177-buffett-may-not-have-sold-jnj/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fwallstreet.com/article/177-buffett-may-not-have-sold-jnj/</link>
	<description>Value Investing Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 10:55:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.fwallstreet.com/article/177-buffett-may-not-have-sold-jnj/#comment-2774</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 18:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fwallstreet.com/article/177-buffett-may-not-have-sold-jnj#comment-2774</guid>
		<description>Dear Joe

Your valuation method would give a buy at $51 if you include the 2008 results in, instead of $60  previously. How do you rectify and account for this situation and assure which is the appropriate value. Does that mean you have bought at a premium because the fcf in 2008 has decreased?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Joe</p>
<p>Your valuation method would give a buy at $51 if you include the 2008 results in, instead of $60  previously. How do you rectify and account for this situation and assure which is the appropriate value. Does that mean you have bought at a premium because the fcf in 2008 has decreased?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Ponzio</title>
		<link>http://www.fwallstreet.com/article/177-buffett-may-not-have-sold-jnj/#comment-2725</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Ponzio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 10:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fwallstreet.com/article/177-buffett-may-not-have-sold-jnj#comment-2725</guid>
		<description>The letter had a few more Buffett quips that will certainly stand the test of time. We now know that Buffett sold positions to preserve capital levels ahead of what he predicts to be very tough times. Notice that he specifically called COP an error, but not JNJ.

Dan - I like Morningstar&#039;s premium service as a &lt;i&gt;starting&lt;/i&gt; point for research.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The letter had a few more Buffett quips that will certainly stand the test of time. We now know that Buffett sold positions to preserve capital levels ahead of what he predicts to be very tough times. Notice that he specifically called COP an error, but not JNJ.</p>
<p>Dan &#8211; I like Morningstar&#8217;s premium service as a <i>starting</i> point for research.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Folkert van den Broek</title>
		<link>http://www.fwallstreet.com/article/177-buffett-may-not-have-sold-jnj/#comment-2724</link>
		<dc:creator>Folkert van den Broek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 10:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fwallstreet.com/article/177-buffett-may-not-have-sold-jnj#comment-2724</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt; Sure he could sell POSCO but there is a high probability that the shares will go up if there is higher inflation and he still hasn&#039;t lost on that position.

Berkshire actually bought more Posco shares in 2008 at about $ 400 a share. Be aware the PKX ADRs represent a quarter of a share.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt; Sure he could sell POSCO but there is a high probability that the shares will go up if there is higher inflation and he still hasn&#8217;t lost on that position.</p>
<p>Berkshire actually bought more Posco shares in 2008 at about $ 400 a share. Be aware the PKX ADRs represent a quarter of a share.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.fwallstreet.com/article/177-buffett-may-not-have-sold-jnj/#comment-2722</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 13:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fwallstreet.com/article/177-buffett-may-not-have-sold-jnj#comment-2722</guid>
		<description>Hi everyone, Joe, thanks again for your beautiful site. 

Yeah I&#039;m sorry to post this here although it has nothing really to do with the JNJ Sell, Except that I&#039;m thinking of buying some for myself soon =) (Joe, please feel free to move this to where-ever you seem appropriate.)

The recent (and by recent I mean few months) turmoil really pushed me into searching stocks for myself, apart from JNJ, which came to my attention from reading about it here or in Buffet related articles, I find it really hard to find stocks by looking at what I really want. What I mean is that I&#039;m dying to find a stock screener that actually checks FCF, CROIC, or any *valuable* figures. any suggestions? and please add if you can the criteria you usually use.

Thanks a lot,

Dan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi everyone, Joe, thanks again for your beautiful site. </p>
<p>Yeah I&#8217;m sorry to post this here although it has nothing really to do with the JNJ Sell, Except that I&#8217;m thinking of buying some for myself soon =) (Joe, please feel free to move this to where-ever you seem appropriate.)</p>
<p>The recent (and by recent I mean few months) turmoil really pushed me into searching stocks for myself, apart from JNJ, which came to my attention from reading about it here or in Buffet related articles, I find it really hard to find stocks by looking at what I really want. What I mean is that I&#8217;m dying to find a stock screener that actually checks FCF, CROIC, or any *valuable* figures. any suggestions? and please add if you can the criteria you usually use.</p>
<p>Thanks a lot,</p>
<p>Dan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.fwallstreet.com/article/177-buffett-may-not-have-sold-jnj/#comment-2721</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 13:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fwallstreet.com/article/177-buffett-may-not-have-sold-jnj#comment-2721</guid>
		<description>Hi everyone, Joe, thanks again for your beautiful site. 

Yeah I&#039;m sorry to post this here although it has nothing really to do with the JNJ Sell, Except that I&#039;m thinking of buying some for myself soon =) (Joe, please feel free to move this to where-ever you seem appropriate.)

The recent (and by recent I mean few months) turmoil really pushed me into searching stocks for myself, apart from JNJ, which came to my attention from reading about it here or in Buffet related articles, I find it really hard to find stocks by looking at what I really want. What I mean is that I&#039;m dying to find a stock screener that actually checks FCF, CROIC, or any *valuable* figures. any suggestions? and please add if you can the criteria you usually use.

Thanks a lot,

Dan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi everyone, Joe, thanks again for your beautiful site. </p>
<p>Yeah I&#8217;m sorry to post this here although it has nothing really to do with the JNJ Sell, Except that I&#8217;m thinking of buying some for myself soon =) (Joe, please feel free to move this to where-ever you seem appropriate.)</p>
<p>The recent (and by recent I mean few months) turmoil really pushed me into searching stocks for myself, apart from JNJ, which came to my attention from reading about it here or in Buffet related articles, I find it really hard to find stocks by looking at what I really want. What I mean is that I&#8217;m dying to find a stock screener that actually checks FCF, CROIC, or any *valuable* figures. any suggestions? and please add if you can the criteria you usually use.</p>
<p>Thanks a lot,</p>
<p>Dan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rene</title>
		<link>http://www.fwallstreet.com/article/177-buffett-may-not-have-sold-jnj/#comment-2720</link>
		<dc:creator>Rene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 17:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fwallstreet.com/article/177-buffett-may-not-have-sold-jnj#comment-2720</guid>
		<description>That is one of my favorite Buffett quotes.When I was a freshman in college I learned the following simple logical inference:

Socrates is a man.

All men are mortal.

Therefore, Socrates is mortal.

Later in Logic class I learned to build proofs that where several pages long and very impressive looking in their complexity.  I would spend hours verifying their validity and when they worked they were a beautiful thing.  However, the huge lesson that I took away from all my studies was a very simple one, that you could have a beautiful valid argument which was also utterly false, simply because you failed to notice that the Socrates in question was not the famous philosopher, but your girlfriend&#039;s cat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is one of my favorite Buffett quotes.When I was a freshman in college I learned the following simple logical inference:</p>
<p>Socrates is a man.</p>
<p>All men are mortal.</p>
<p>Therefore, Socrates is mortal.</p>
<p>Later in Logic class I learned to build proofs that where several pages long and very impressive looking in their complexity.  I would spend hours verifying their validity and when they worked they were a beautiful thing.  However, the huge lesson that I took away from all my studies was a very simple one, that you could have a beautiful valid argument which was also utterly false, simply because you failed to notice that the Socrates in question was not the famous philosopher, but your girlfriend&#8217;s cat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aigle</title>
		<link>http://www.fwallstreet.com/article/177-buffett-may-not-have-sold-jnj/#comment-2718</link>
		<dc:creator>Aigle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 20:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fwallstreet.com/article/177-buffett-may-not-have-sold-jnj#comment-2718</guid>
		<description>We had a few more good gems from the Teacher as he rolled out his annual letter yesterday.  The following one is one of the most poignant to me, rendering me giggling, enlightened, puzzled, reassured as the same time.

&quot;Investors should be skeptical of history-based models. Constructed by a nerdy-sounding priesthood using esoteric terms such as beta, gamma, sigma and the like, these models tend to look impressive. Too often, though, investors forget to examine the assumptions behind the symbols. Our advice: Beware of geeks bearing formulas.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We had a few more good gems from the Teacher as he rolled out his annual letter yesterday.  The following one is one of the most poignant to me, rendering me giggling, enlightened, puzzled, reassured as the same time.</p>
<p>&#8220;Investors should be skeptical of history-based models. Constructed by a nerdy-sounding priesthood using esoteric terms such as beta, gamma, sigma and the like, these models tend to look impressive. Too often, though, investors forget to examine the assumptions behind the symbols. Our advice: Beware of geeks bearing formulas.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MJ Patel</title>
		<link>http://www.fwallstreet.com/article/177-buffett-may-not-have-sold-jnj/#comment-2716</link>
		<dc:creator>MJ Patel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 10:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fwallstreet.com/article/177-buffett-may-not-have-sold-jnj#comment-2716</guid>
		<description>Buffett sold JNJ out of necessity for much needed capital towards the GE and Goldman Sachs preferred shares.  He also sold some PG and COP.  The reason I think he sold these particular investments is due to the capital gains taxes if he had sold out of other positions.  

JNJ and PG might be affected negatively in the near future due to high inflation and poor currency conversions. COP was a loss and although oil prices may eventually go higher, they are not going to go back to 2008 levels within the next year.  Sure he could sell POSCO but there is a high probability that the shares will go up if there is higher inflation and he still hasn&#039;t lost on that position.

Notice that he did not sell out entirely on these positions and still feels comfortable with holding them. He may even purchase additional shares as more capital becomes available for him to invest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buffett sold JNJ out of necessity for much needed capital towards the GE and Goldman Sachs preferred shares.  He also sold some PG and COP.  The reason I think he sold these particular investments is due to the capital gains taxes if he had sold out of other positions.  </p>
<p>JNJ and PG might be affected negatively in the near future due to high inflation and poor currency conversions. COP was a loss and although oil prices may eventually go higher, they are not going to go back to 2008 levels within the next year.  Sure he could sell POSCO but there is a high probability that the shares will go up if there is higher inflation and he still hasn&#8217;t lost on that position.</p>
<p>Notice that he did not sell out entirely on these positions and still feels comfortable with holding them. He may even purchase additional shares as more capital becomes available for him to invest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://www.fwallstreet.com/article/177-buffett-may-not-have-sold-jnj/#comment-2714</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fwallstreet.com/article/177-buffett-may-not-have-sold-jnj#comment-2714</guid>
		<description>The market has fallen 50% since he bought JNJ.

It&#039;s a no brainer -- he found more attractive places to put the dough.

Buffett thinks in terms of opportunity cost. 

D.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The market has fallen 50% since he bought JNJ.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a no brainer &#8212; he found more attractive places to put the dough.</p>
<p>Buffett thinks in terms of opportunity cost. </p>
<p>D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Ponzio</title>
		<link>http://www.fwallstreet.com/article/177-buffett-may-not-have-sold-jnj/#comment-2712</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Ponzio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fwallstreet.com/article/177-buffett-may-not-have-sold-jnj#comment-2712</guid>
		<description>We know that Buffett and Munger were buyers because JNJ is owned by Blue Chip and Wesco - companies controlled directly (and jointly or solely) by Buffett and Munger respectively. Neither of those entities sold JNJ; so, we don&#039;t know if Buffett or Munger directed the sale.

I&#039;m sure that the question will come up at this year&#039;s annual meeting, though I doubt he&#039;ll talk about it as he doesn&#039;t like to discuss current holdings. We&#039;ll know for certain in a few months.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We know that Buffett and Munger were buyers because JNJ is owned by Blue Chip and Wesco &#8211; companies controlled directly (and jointly or solely) by Buffett and Munger respectively. Neither of those entities sold JNJ; so, we don&#8217;t know if Buffett or Munger directed the sale.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure that the question will come up at this year&#8217;s annual meeting, though I doubt he&#8217;ll talk about it as he doesn&#8217;t like to discuss current holdings. We&#8217;ll know for certain in a few months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

