Log in or Register
You are here: Home  /  Workouts, Arbitrage, & Hedges  /  Workouts Work Out In Down Markets – Part 2

Workouts Work Out In Down Markets – Part 2

January 18, 2008  |  Joe Ponzio  |  about: / / / /

So, you’re sold on using arbitrage to enhance your portfolio. In fact, you’ve always known that arbitrage can offer virtually risk-free profits; still, it can be somewhat scary to jump in with both feet. Rather than getting into the theoretical aspects of arbitrage, let’s take a look at some real life examples of when you can have a high degree of confidence…and when you should be leery.

First off, let me thank the visitors of F Wall Street. In the comments to Workouts Work Out In Down Markets – Part 1, Tim J, D, and Heterocedastico asked about specific opportunities. In addition, George from Fat Pitch Financials jumped in to confirm the value of arbitrage, and Kevin posted this free website that tracks various arbitrage opportunities.

I responded to Tim’s comment about MGM here. So, let’s look at Oracle’s potential purchase of BEA Systems.

The Offer

Oracle is offering BEA Systems (BEAS) shareholders $19.375 per share in the merger agreement. At this point, Steps 1-4 have likely been completed as the companies have agreed on a price and have a general feel that this deal will go through. Buying BEAS today gives you the opportunity to earn roughly $0.90 per share on completion of the merger, or about 5%.

Management expects the merger to be completed by mid-2008.

The Obstacles

According to the 8-k (“Current Report”) BEAS filed with the SEC:

Merger is subject to clearance under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 and the applicable merger control laws of the European Commission and other jurisdictions, as well as other customary closing conditions.

In addition, it must be cleared by a majority of the shareholders. This can be a major obstacle if management and other people on board don’t control the majority – or a large part – of the outstanding shares.

A look at BEA’s most recent annual report filed with the SEC, the directors and executive officers only control about 4.1% of the outstanding shares. That will have likely increased by the time the proxy to shareholders goes out (Step 6); still, it is unlikely that they will be able to control a majority unless the major institutions really love the deal. If these shareholders feel like they are getting a raw deal, it could fall through.

So, are Carl Icahn, Private Capital Management, and AMVESCAP – in total controlling 28+% of the company – on board? We don’t know yet.

At this point, the transaction doesn’t look nearly risk-free. If the merger falls through, BEAS stock will likely drop to (or through) its $16 level again, and you are out $2.50 a share (11%) or more.

There Is No Hurry

The deal is expected to close in mid-2008. More than likely, that’s noise at this point. It could just as easily close in Q3 or Q4 of 2008. Without knowing how long it will take for regulatory approval (Step 5), “mid-2008″ is a goal, not a plan.

The Rewards

Then, of course, you have to look at the potential rewards. At today’s price, you have the opportunity to earn about 5% on the upside over the course of 6-12 months. You can earn nearly that much in a Certificate of Deposit (CD) over the next year – with virtually no risk!

The Goal of Arbitrage

In arbitrage, the goal is to earn high rates of return on an annualized basis in low-risk, high-certainty situations. I look for “done deals” that are mis-priced due to other peoples’ fear. When would a 5% return satisfy me? When I can get it in a few weeks. If we have gotten past Step 5 and there are two or three months to go, I want to see a 10% spread between the current price and the merger or acquisition price.

If the merger or acquisition (or going private) transaction is more than three months out, it likely hasn’t gotten past Step 4 or 5 and it is a purely speculative play.

When should we look at BEAS as an arbitrage play? I’ll take a look in a few months, once I get the news that regulatory approval has passed and that the shareholders (who, in this case, control the majority) aren’t going to revolt or upset the applecart.

New Motion’s Merger With Traffix

I’m a fan of the 10-Q Detective. I love getting his blog feed to my Outlook because he really loves turning over rocks, particularly in smaller companies. On January 11, he posted an arbitrage play appearing to yield 42%. In short, New Motion (NWMO) is engaging in a stock for stock merger with Traffix (TRFX). With NWMO trading near $12 and TRFX just under $5, it appears to be a 40+% return.

If you head over to TRFX’s proxy recently sent to shareholders, you’ll see that Traffix shareholders will receive “approximately 0.681 shares of New Motion common stock for each share of Traffix, based on the currently anticipated capitalization of both companies as of the closing date of the merger.” In short, buying 100 shares of TRFX at $4.90 today would cost $490 (plus broker fees) and, upon closing, you would end up with 68 shares of NWMO.

If NWMO were to hold its $11.95 price, this would seem like a sweet deal. Your $490 of TRFX stock is now worth $814 of NWMO.

The Problem

NWMO has 12,096,284 shares outstanding. To complete the merger, it will have to issue another 11,917,520 shares to TRFX stockholders, thereby changing NWMO’s outstanding shares to 24,013,804. Combining the two market caps of the companies (perhaps not the best way to do it, but it gives us an idea), post-merger NWMO would trade at roughly $9.11.

Your $490 investment in TRFX is now worth $620 in NWMO. Still not a bad return, but let’s continue.

NWMO is coming off the bulletin board to get quoted on the NASDAQ. As of right now, there is virtually no volume on the stock – a company that used to trade (split-adjusted) for more than $600 a share, went through bankruptcy, reverse split, and is back in operation. When it hits the NASDAQ and can be traded more freely, with long-term stockholders run – pushing the price down in the process?

TRFX is listed on NASDAQ. You can’t really say it trades with an average volume of 29,000.

So, one company barely trades and has had a rough history (and, perhaps, a correspondingly desperate or indifferent shareholder base) and the other company is barely traded. What does this mean for you? Odds are, you are going to hold stock in a thinly traded stock. The price you see (ie., roughly $9.11) may not be the price you get if you sell.

In addition, shareholders that didn’t like the acquisition or that now have the opportunity to sell may push the price down. If it gets below $7.20 a share, your premium is gone.

The Solution

I don’t like to put my faith in stock for stock acquisitions. When I commit money to an arbitrage position, I don’t want my fate determined by a short-sighted market. That’s why I like cash deals – going private transactions, cash buyouts, etc.

And that’s it for now. I guess we’ll have a Part 3 to this discussion next week.

Joe Ponzio

By Joe Ponzio

January 18, 2008

Print or Share With Friends

The Discussion
mark
mark
January 19, 2008 at 1:37am

Joe,

Thanks for the blog as always it has proven invaluable. I have only been at this stuff for a year now and seem to find the most valuable-straight forward info here. Any thoughts on the HUNTSMAN-APPOLLO aquisition. Everything i have looked at seems like it has all the check list covered except regulatory approval.

Thanks again for the great site!

Mark

Casey Mattson
Casey Mattson
January 19, 2008 at 9:34am

I am interested in watching the BAC / CFC merger. It appears the market doesn’t think it will happen or get repriced down from the current arrangement. I know this is not your preferred method (stock for stock), but I would be interested to see what you have to say. I do think for the long term, it is a good acquisition. People seem to think that none of the CFC assets are worth anything. I have no idea, nor does anyone really, that will be bourne out in time. But to say the book value of the company needs to drop by 60% or more, seem irrational to me.

Any FWS reader or comments from Joe? I think this is a good topic, considering, some folks, (Buffett, for example) have been buying BAC, it might be a cheap way to pick up some shares, or the Short term Arb play. Obviously it has a long way to go to get through the checklist Joe has.

Anyway, some random thoughts from a cold cold man in MN. -14 degrees as we write, I don’t even want to know what the windchill is today.

ask1000
ask1000
January 20, 2008 at 8:21am

Have you, Joe, or anyone else been following the Nokia/Navteq acquisition? As far as I know, the proposed price per share of Navteq is 78. At the moment, it is trading at 72.51, and the closing date is scheduled for this first quarter (and it has been approved by Navteq shareholders). This provides a sizable annualized gain. Does anyone have some idea as to why there is such a large discrepancy between the current trading price and the offer price? Is it merely due to the overall market situation?

(MikeR)
(MikeR)
January 20, 2008 at 10:06am

Casey,

You will find this WSJ article useful concerning the BAC/CFC deal entitled “Doubts Over Deal Hits CFC Shares.”

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120070492065001981.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

January 21, 2008 at 9:47am

Mark: Even at the risk of missing a potentially handsome return, I won’t jump in until after Step 5.

ask1000: I’ll take a look at it. There is often a nice gap right up until the last few days or weeks.

Casey: (MikeR) posted a nice article (above) on it. At this point, I feel this deal is more speculation than workout. That’s not to say money can’t be made, but it doesn’t seem to meet that “virtually risk-less” status yet.

Mike
Mike
February 9, 2008 at 5:34am

Had my luch handed to me holding on to my TRFX shares. Wish i would have found this analysis first.

Good stuff, keep it up.

February 11, 2008 at 10:03pm

Mike,

Sorry to hear about TRFX. We can’t be right all the time. The important thing is to get back on the horse because, over the long term, carefully approached workouts can be a goldmine, even after the occasional (and sometimes substantial) loss.

Allen
Allen
June 26, 2009 at 3:48pm

So in this example of TRFX, I know it’s a late. But to hedge the risk of New Motion price moving down, wouldn’t you just short New Motion shares based on the number shares you would have gotten after your TRFX position is converted to New Motion shares?

July 9, 2009 at 10:13pm

Allen,

The problem with this particular workout was the size/limited liquidity of the two companies. Normally you would buy one and short an equal amount in the other. In very thinly traded stocks like these, selling short is very difficult, if not impossible.

In general, brokerage firms will allow you borrow shares to short a stock only if one of their other customers owns the stock in a margin account. (They will only “locate” shares outside their own firm to borrow shares from other firms for their large institutional customers.) In the case of this merger arbitrage, the thinly held/traded nature of these companies made the possibility of shorting highly unlikely.

In that case, your only option would be to go long and hope to sell upon completion/conversion. I didn’t make that clear in the article – sorry!

Join The Discussion